Hylly
Henkilönnimi Schwemer, Sebastian Felix, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Decision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 55(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 55(1)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01418-4 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00124578
*008 s2024 gw e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aSchwemer, Sebastian Felix,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aDecision Quality and Errors in Content Moderation /$cSebastian Felix Schwemer.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2024.
*300 $as. 139-156
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(1)
*520 $aIn certain instances, algorithmic content moderation by online platforms is a process with binary outcomes: those that are “right” and those that are “wrong”. And, in a copyright content moderation context, this binary nature, in principle, holds true: the ultimate question is simply, “Is this content illegal?” However, some content moderation decisions are more straightforward than others that require more robust assessment, whether by domain experts, or even the courts. This article explores the relationship between errors in content moderation decision-making and decision quality, as well as how errors are addressed in the Digital Services Act and the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market.
*61024$aEuroopan unioni$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000035482
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$averkkopalvelut$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6624$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-direktiivit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10768$2yso/fin
*650 7$asisällönsuodatus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23049$2yso/fin
*650 7$apäätöksenteko $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743
*653 $aDigital Services Act (DSA)
*653 $aDSM-direktiivi
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(1)
*852 $hSA-IIC
*856 $uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01418-4$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.