Hylly
Yhteisönnimi The Bird & Bird IP Team, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Round-up of national decisions on online intermediaries and platforms 2023
Julkaistu Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 19(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Online enforcement of intellectual property rights has for a long time relied on the involvement of online intermediaries and platforms. Besides injunctions against ‘innocent’ intermediaries, questions surrounding the type of and conditions for establishing liability of online intermediaries and platforms have also gained increasing prominence. In Europe, for example, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has repeatedly tackled these issues. European Union (EU) legislature has also legislated in this area: on the one hand, Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 is premised on the direct responsibility of certain types of online platforms—online content sharing service providers—for user-uploaded content; on the other hand, the Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065), while reiterating the importance of safe harbours for online intermediaries, has introduced due diligence and transparency obligations that are not premised on any liability of their addressees.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 19(3)
*000 ab a ar
*00124672
*008 s2024 xxk e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1102 $aThe Bird & Bird IP Team,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aRound-up of national decisions on online intermediaries and platforms 2023 /$cThe Bird & Bird IP Team.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2024.
*300 $as. 206-216
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v19(3)
*520 $aOnline enforcement of intellectual property rights has for a long time relied on the involvement of online intermediaries and platforms. Besides injunctions against ‘innocent’ intermediaries, questions surrounding the type of and conditions for establishing liability of online intermediaries and platforms have also gained increasing prominence. In Europe, for example, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has repeatedly tackled these issues. European Union (EU) legislature has also legislated in this area: on the one hand, Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 is premised on the direct responsibility of certain types of online platforms—online content sharing service providers—for user-uploaded content; on the other hand, the Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065), while reiterating the importance of safe harbours for online intermediaries, has introduced due diligence and transparency obligations that are not premised on any liability of their addressees.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*650 7$averkkopalvelut$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6624$2yso/fin
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*653 $aDSM-direktiivi
*653 $aArtikla 17
*653 $aDigital Services Act (DSA)
*653 $averkkoalustat
*653 $averkkopalveluntarjoajat
*653 $aonline intermediaries
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v19(3)
*852 $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.