Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Borrowed Fiction and the Rightful Copyright
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, ISSN 0736-7694 ; 32(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Works of borrowed fictionunauthorized sequels or retellings of literary workshave long prompted legal, cultural, and social backlash. With respect to copyright disputes, this is because borrowed fiction entails a range of legitimate but conflicting interests. Copyright law has historically elevated the interests of the original author over those of other writers and the reading public. Scholars have offered a range of proposals to counter this tendency, but these reforms have focused on the infringement analysis and the fair use doctrine. Each of those, however, involves a binary decision, one that is not amenable to accommodating the conflicting interests at stake. This Article proposes that a better accommodation between and among these interests can be achieved at the remedial stage. By taking seriously both the rightful position notion in remedies law and the Supreme Courts admonition against presumptive injunctive relief, courts can reach a more nuanced result in borrowed fiction cases. Under this approach, the full panoply of remedies would remain available, but rarely would anything more than compensatory damages be necessary to put the plaintiff in her rightful copyright position.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 0736-7694 ; 32(3)
*00002077nab a22002894a 4500
*0019233
*00520201106111817.0
*007tu
*008150119s2014\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a21794
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000021794
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-CA30
*1001 $aMoffat, Viva R.
*24510$aBorrowed Fiction and the Rightful Copyright /$cViva R. Moffat.
*260 $c2014.
*300 $a839-889.
*4901 $aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v32(3)
*520 $aWorks of borrowed fictionunauthorized sequels or retellings of literary workshave long prompted legal, cultural, and social backlash. With respect to copyright disputes, this is because borrowed fiction entails a range of legitimate but conflicting interests. Copyright law has historically elevated the interests of the original author over those of other writers and the reading public. Scholars have offered a range of proposals to counter this tendency, but these reforms have focused on the infringement analysis and the fair use doctrine. Each of those, however, involves a binary decision, one that is not amenable to accommodating the conflicting interests at stake. This Article proposes that a better accommodation between and among these interests can be achieved at the remedial stage. By taking seriously both the rightful position notion in remedies law and the Supreme Courts admonition against presumptive injunctive relief, courts can reach a more nuanced result in borrowed fiction cases. Under this approach, the full panoply of remedies would remain available, but rarely would anything more than compensatory damages be necessary to put the plaintiff in her rightful copyright position.
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUDELLINEN SUOJA
*653 $aKIRJALLISET TEOKSET
*653 $aCOPYRIGHT PROTECTION
*653 $aFICTION
*830 0$aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v32(3)
*852 $hSA-CA30$cMOFFAT
*979 $a0000021794
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.