Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Raging blow for laches defence
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SEROR SA-IN45
Henkilönnimi
  • Seror, Matthew L.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Raging blow for laches defence
Julkaistu
  • 2014.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 13-14.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Intellectual Property Magazine, ISSN 2044-7175 ; July/August
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • In Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc, the Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) severely limited the application of the defence of laches (generally defined as the unreasonable and prejudicial delay in commencing suit) in copyright infringement actions. The dispute centred around the critically acclaimed motion picture Raging Bull, and pitted the equitable doctrine of laches against a congressionally prescribed statute of limitations. The court, in a holding which could have far reaching effects on the availability and application of equitable defences in a wide range of cases, reversed a lower court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s copyright infringement claims based on the doctrine of laches.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton 
*00001535nab a22003014a 4500
*0019272
*00520201106111817.0
*007tu
*008150121s2014\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0fin|c
*035  $a21834
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000021834
*0410 $afin
*090  $aOMA:SA-IN45
*1001 $aSeror, Matthew L.
*24510$aRaging blow for laches defence /$cMatthew L Seror.
*260  $c2014.
*300  $a13-14.
*4901 $aIntellectual Property Magazine,$x2044-7175 ;$vJuly/August
*520  $aIn Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc, the Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) severely limited the application of the defence of laches (generally defined as the unreasonable and prejudicial delay in commencing suit) in copyright infringement actions. The dispute centred around the critically acclaimed motion picture Raging Bull, and pitted the equitable doctrine of laches against a congressionally prescribed statute of limitations. The court, in a holding which could have far reaching effects on the availability and application of equitable defences in a wide range of cases, reversed a lower court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s copyright infringement claims based on the doctrine of laches.
*653  $aOIKEUDENKÄYNTI
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aKÄSIKIRJOITUKSET
*653  $aYHDYSVALLAT
*653  $aPERILLISET
*653  $aAJOITUS
*8102 $aIntellectual Property Magazine,$x2044-7175 ;$vJuly/August
*852  $hSA-IN45$cSEROR
*979  $a0000021834
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
22391Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoVarasto SA-Intellectual Property Magazine