Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto : Copyright in the EU : in search of (in)flexibilities

Hylly	ROSATI SA-JO70
Henkilönnimi	Rosati, Eleonora.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö	Copyright in the EU : in search of (in)flexibilities
Julkaistu	2014.
Ulkoasutiedot	565-574.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa	Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 9 (7)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.	Over the past few years consensus has grown around the idea that current EU legislative framework for copyright lacks the flexibility needed to accommodate emerging interests, specifically those arising in connection with technological development. In particular, the principal directive in the area of EU copyright, ie Directive 2001/29/EC, has been widely criticised for having failed to increase legal certainty in the EU and, overall, has been considered a badly drafted, compromise-ridden, ambiguous piece of legislation. While debate as to whether the InfoSoc Directive should be reformed has gained momentum, limited attention has been devoted to exploring the relationship between this directive, the emerging doctrine of EU pre-emption and the room left for national initiatives. It remains uncertain to what extent Member States are free to legislate in areas affected by the InfoSoc Directive, notably exclusive rights and related exceptions and limitations. This contribution seeks to address two main questions: Are Member States entitled to alter, ie broaden or restrict, the scope of the exclusive rights harmonised by the InfoSoc Directive? May Member States decide (as the UK did) not to transpose the full language of exceptions and limitations once they chose to implement a certain exception or limitation from Article 5 catalogue into their national laws? The answer should be in the negative in both cases. This is because Directive 2001/29/EC leaves much more limited room for independent national initiatives than what has been so far understood.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton	EU LAINSÄÄDÄNTÖ TEKIJÄNOIKEUS DIREKTIIVIT JOUSTAVUUS

*00002416nab a22002894a 4500
*0019596
*00520201106111819.0
*007tu
*008150318s2014\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a22169
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000022169
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-JO70
*1001 $aRosati, Eleonora.
*24510$aCopyright in the EU :$bin search of (in)flexibilities /$cEleonora Rosati.
*260  $c2014.
*300  $a565-574.
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v9 (7)
*520  $aOver the past few years consensus has grown around the idea that current EU legislative framework for copyright lacks the flexibility needed to accommodate emerging interests, specifically those arising in connection with technological development. In particular, the principal directive in the area of EU copyright, ie Directive 2001/29/EC, has been widely criticised for having failed to increase legal certainty in the EU and, overall, has been considered a badly drafted, compromise-ridden, ambiguous piece of legislation.  While debate as to whether the InfoSoc Directive should be reformed has gained momentum, limited attention has been devoted to exploring the relationship between this directive, the emerging doctrine of EU pre-emption and the room left for national initiatives. It remains uncertain to what extent Member States are free to legislate in areas affected by the InfoSoc Directive, notably exclusive rights and related exceptions and limitations. This contribution seeks to address two main questions: Are Member States entitled to alter, ie broaden or restrict, the scope of the exclusive rights harmonised by the InfoSoc Directive? May Member States decide (as the UK did) not to transpose the full language of exceptions and limitations once they chose to implement a certain exception or limitation from Article 5 catalogue into their national laws?  The answer should be in the negative in both cases. This is because Directive 2001/29/EC leaves much more limited room for independent national initiatives than what has been so far understood.
*653  $aEU
*653  $aLAINSÄÄDÄNTÖ
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aDIREKTIIVIT
*653  $aJOUSTAVUUS
*8102 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v7
*852  $hSA-JO70$cROSATI
*979  $a0000022169
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^

Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.