Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö The Territoriality Referendum
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
Yleinen huomautus Special Issue on Intellectual Property and Geography.
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Internet users are participating unconsciously in an informalbut very importantreferendum on the future of the territoriality of intellectual property rights (IPRs),particularly copyright. Users cast their votes in this referendum through their use of tools that enable them to evade geoblocking. Geoblocking is used by content providers on the internet for the purpose of geographically limiting user access to content, often because of territorial limitations that relate to IPR protection. The degree to which users evade geolocation will influence how governments and the private sector regard the future of the territoriality of IPRs. Although the results of the informal referendum might not result in a dramatic departure from the notion of IPRs as territorially constrained rights, the results might prompt governments to consider novel legal approaches to IPRs and inspire the private sector to develop new business modelsto bridge countries borders and provide greater cross-border accessto IPR-protected works
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_journal_wpj6n1.pdf
*00002171nab a22004094a 4500
*0019670
*00520201106111820.0
*007tu
*008150327s2014\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a22247
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000022247
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-WI20
*1001 $aTrimble, Marketa.
*24510$aThe Territoriality Referendum /$cMarketa Trimble.
*260 $c2014.
*300 $a89-98.
*4901 $aThe WIPO Journal ;$v6 (1)
*500 $aSpecial Issue on Intellectual Property and Geography.
*520 $aInternet users are participating unconsciously in an informalbut very importantreferendum on the future of the territoriality of intellectual property rights (IPRs),particularly copyright. Users cast their votes in this referendum through their use of tools that enable them to evade geoblocking. Geoblocking is used by content providers on the internet for the purpose of geographically limiting user access to content, often because of territorial limitations that relate to IPR protection. The degree to which users evade geolocation will influence how governments and the private sector regard the future of the territoriality of IPRs. Although the results of the informal referendum might not result in a dramatic departure from the notion of IPRs as territorially constrained rights, the results might prompt governments to consider novel legal approaches to IPRs and inspire the private sector to develop new business modelsto bridge countries borders and provide greater cross-border accessto IPR-protected works
*653 $aMAANTIEDE
*653 $aIMMATERIAALIOIKEUS
*653 $aESTOT
*653 $aRAJOITUKSET
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aINTERNET
*653 $aBLOKKAUS
*653 $aBLOCKING INJUNCTIONS
*653 $aCOPYRIGHT
*653 $aINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
*653 $aINTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS
*653 $aTERRITORIAL APPLICATION
*653 $aWEBSITE S
*830 0$aThe WIPO Journal ;$v1.
*852 $hSA-WI20$cTRIMBLE
*85640$uhttp://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_journal_wpj6n1.pdf
*979 $a0000022247
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.