Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö The Fair Trial Procedure for Intellectual Property in Light of TRIPS Provisions : An Analytical Study of Jordan and The UK
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Journal of intellectual property rights, ISSN 0975-1076 ; 22 (11)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. This study analyses the elements of a fair trial in the context of IP proceedings, comparing between procedural safeguards available in Jordan and the UK (especially England and Wales). Obligations between states at the international and regional level are analysed, along with their implications at the national level in the UK and Jordan, linked to the EU through the Euro-Med Association Agreement with Jordan. The international human rights instruments provide a common framework in accordance with TRIPS provisions interpreted could bridge the gaps that may arise between the British and Jordanian Jurisdictions. The study uses doctrinal comparative and qualitative methods to examine these issues and also the relation between criminal and other methods of enforcement - civil and administrative. Use of criminal procedures may significantly reduce the costs of lengthy civil litigation, and be in the public interest and the interest of all parties. Finally, recommendations are made for Jordan mainly.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/44434/1/JIPR%2022%286%29%20320-328.pdf
*00002438nab a22004574a 4500
*00112832
*00520201106111838.0
*007tu
*008180924s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a25565
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000025565
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-JIPR
*1001 $aMassadeh, Firas.
*24510$aThe Fair Trial Procedure for Intellectual Property in Light of TRIPS Provisions :$bAn Analytical Study of Jordan and The UK /$cFiras Massadeh, Mohammad Alkrisheh.
*260 $c2017.
*300 $a320-328.
*4901 $aJournal of intellectual property rights,$x0975-1076 ;$v22 (11)
*520 $aThis study analyses the elements of a fair trial in the context of IP proceedings, comparing between procedural safeguards available in Jordan and the UK (especially England and Wales). Obligations between states at the international and regional level are analysed, along with their implications at the national level in the UK and Jordan, linked to the EU through the Euro-Med Association Agreement with Jordan. The international human rights instruments provide a common framework in accordance with TRIPS provisions interpreted could bridge the gaps that may arise between the British and Jordanian Jurisdictions. The study uses doctrinal comparative and qualitative methods to examine these issues and also the relation between criminal and other methods of enforcement - civil and administrative. Use of criminal procedures may significantly reduce the costs of lengthy civil litigation, and be in the public interest and the interest of all parties. Finally, recommendations are made for Jordan mainly.
*653 $aTRIPS
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aJORDANIA
*653 $aISO-BRITANNIA
*653 $aOIKEUDENKÄYNTI
*653 $aOIKEUDENMUKAISUUS
*653 $aWTO
*653 $aCOMMON LAW SYSTEM
*653 $aCIVIL LAW SYSTEM
*653 $aCONSTITUTIONAL REFORM ACT
*653 $a2010
*653 $aCOPYRIGHT
*653 $aDESIGN S AND PATENTS ACT
*653 $a1988
*653 $aECTHR
*653 $aCRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT
*653 $aPROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS
*7001 $aAlkrisheh, Mohammad.
*8102 $aJournal of intellectual property rights,$x0975-1076 ;$v11
*852 $hSA-JIPR$cMASSADEH
*85640$uhttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/44434/1/JIPR%2022%286%29%20320-328.pdf
*979 $a0000025565
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.