Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Decoding Authorship : Is There Really no Place for an Algorithmic Author Under Copyright Law?
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 54(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The third technological revolution is dragging the world, incrementally but surely, into an era where Artificial Intelligent (AI) is taking over cultural production from human beings. Nevertheless, authorship remains largely defined in humanistic terms across Western cultures as a projection of the image of the “romantic author” emanating from the 18th century. Although it is not spelt out in the law, judges do seem to demonstrate remarked reluctance to grant authorship status to AI. The developments in three important areas may enable a reconstruction of the human-centric authorship ideology: a structural pro-corporate prejudice, a low threshold for originality, and the judicial avoidance of aesthetic assessment. Distilled to its essence, AI can be as equally creative as human beings as they follow the same laws of cultural production. In dealing with the resulting ownership issue of AI authorship, an altered “work made for hire” doctrine is proposed as a promising solution design template.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 54(1)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01269-5 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00117866
*008 s2023||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aXiao, Yang,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aDecoding Authorship :$bIs There Really no Place for an Algorithmic Author Under Copyright Law? /$cYang Xiao.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2023.
*300 $as. 5–25
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(1)
*520 $aThe third technological revolution is dragging the world, incrementally but surely, into an era where Artificial Intelligent (AI) is taking over cultural production from human beings. Nevertheless, authorship remains largely defined in humanistic terms across Western cultures as a projection of the image of the “romantic author” emanating from the 18th century. Although it is not spelt out in the law, judges do seem to demonstrate remarked reluctance to grant authorship status to AI. The developments in three important areas may enable a reconstruction of the human-centric authorship ideology: a structural pro-corporate prejudice, a low threshold for originality, and the judicial avoidance of aesthetic assessment. Distilled to its essence, AI can be as equally creative as human beings as they follow the same laws of cultural production. In dealing with the resulting ownership issue of AI authorship, an altered “work made for hire” doctrine is proposed as a promising solution design template.
*650 7$ateknologinen kehitys $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8956
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$atekijyys$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14774$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*653 $atekijä
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(1)
*852 $hSA-IIC
*85641$uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01269-5$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.