Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

*000      ab a        ar
*00123136
*008      s2023    gw     e     |||| 0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a"Showcase Lamp [Vitrinenleuchte]" :$bDecision of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) 15 December 2022 – Case No. I ZR 173/21; ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:151222UIZR173.21.0 /$cDirective 2001/29/EC, Art. 2a; Copyright Act, Secs. 2(1) No. 4, (2), 12, 15, 16, 17, 23(1) first sentence, 97.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2023.
*300  $as. 1604–1612
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(10)
*520  $aThe principle that the scope of copyright protection of a work of applied art is not less than that of other works covered by Directive 2001/29/EC (on this point, decision of the CJEU, 12 September 2019 – C-683/17, GRUR 2019, 1185 [juris para. 35] = WRP 2019, 1449 – Cofemel [IIC 51:499 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00935-w]), only means that the same exclusive rights must be granted to works of applied art and the same legal standards must be applied with regard to the scope of these rights as to all other categories of works. However, this statement does not refer to the determination of the concrete scope of copyright protection of a work to be made in the individual case, which results from its level of design.
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$asoveltava taide$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p25668
*651 7$aSaksa$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105087$2yso/fin
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(10)
*852  $hSA-IIC
^