Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Trade Secrets and the Data Act
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-IIC
Henkilönnimi
  • Mylly, Ulla-Maija, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Trade Secrets and the Data Act
Julkaistu
  • Springer, Heidelberg : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 368–393
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 55(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Automated systems collect vast amounts of data, which could be utilized across various business sectors. The EU has recognized their potential for the data economy. To exploit such potential, there is a need to provide access to data. For example, the objective of the EU’s Data Act is to provide new possibilities for accessing and reusing information. Some information exchanged may be subject to trade secret protection. However, specific characteristics of trade secret protection create difficulties for information sharing. In essence, trade secret protection requires that information should be kept secret, or at least relatively secret. This requirement contributes to the reluctance of trade secret holders to share their information. They would rather lock it down. That is because, if the information becomes generally known in industry circles, it will lose its trade secret status along with any related competitive advantage. At the same time, trade secret protection leaves considerable room for competition, which arguably makes it suited to the data economy. A trade secret is not an exclusive right, which means that competitors may independently create similar information. Access to information through reverse engineering is also allowed. All these specific characteristics make trade secret protection an uncertain means of protection. This article will elaborate on how the uncertainties and specifics related to trade secret protection create a conflict between demand for access to information and the protection of trade secrets. It will analyze how the provisions of the Data Act aim to accommodate the protection of trade secrets while simultaneously mandating access.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 55(3).
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01432-0 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000      ab a        ar
*00125224
*008      s2024    gw     e     |||| 0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aMylly, Ulla-Maija,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aTrade Secrets and the Data Act /$cUlla-Maija Mylly.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2024.
*300  $as. 368–393
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(3)
*520  $aAutomated systems collect vast amounts of data, which could be utilized across various business sectors. The EU has recognized their potential for the data economy. To exploit such potential, there is a need to provide access to data. For example, the objective of the EU’s Data Act is to provide new possibilities for accessing and reusing information. Some information exchanged may be subject to trade secret protection. However, specific characteristics of trade secret protection create difficulties for information sharing. In essence, trade secret protection requires that information should be kept secret, or at least relatively secret. This requirement contributes to the reluctance of trade secret holders to share their information. They would rather lock it down. That is because, if the information becomes generally known in industry circles, it will lose its trade secret status along with any related competitive advantage. At the same time, trade secret protection leaves considerable room for competition, which arguably makes it suited to the data economy. A trade secret is not an exclusive right, which means that competitors may independently create similar information. Access to information through reverse engineering is also allowed. All these specific characteristics make trade secret protection an uncertain means of protection. This article will elaborate on how the uncertainties and specifics related to trade secret protection create a conflict between demand for access to information and the protection of trade secrets. It will analyze how the provisions of the Data Act aim to accommodate the protection of trade secrets while simultaneously mandating access.
*61024$aEuroopan unioni$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000035482
*650 7$adata$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27250$2yso/fin
*650 7$adatatalous$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p39693
*650 7$aammattisalaisuus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9524
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(3).
*852  $hSA-IIC
*856  $uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01432-0$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-IIC