Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Audiogest and GEDIPE v. Ar Telecom, Cabovisão, Onitelecom, PT, MEO, Vodafone Portugal, Nos Comunicações Code on Copyright and Related Rights (CDADC), Arts. 176, 178, 184 : Pirate Bay Portugal. Decision of the Intellectual Property Court (Tribunal da Propriedade Intelectual) 24 February 2015 - Case No. 153/14.0YHLSB.
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 47 (4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1. Domain name blocking and the suspension of websites is an extreme and highly problematic measure in the light of human rights. 2. Blocking IP addresses is the most problematic, as not only the infringing site but also legitimate ones are blocked. Such goes beyond the balance and proportionality necessary to ensure the freedoms of information and expression. 3. Domain and sub-domain blocking (DNS blocking) is much less invasive or liable to cause damages or harm third parties, being therefore a more balanced solution.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-016-0479-4
*00001966nab a22003734a 4500
*00110774
*00520201106111827.0
*007tu
*008160822s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a23456
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000023456
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*24500$aAudiogest and GEDIPE v. Ar Telecom, Cabovisão, Onitelecom, PT, MEO, Vodafone Portugal, Nos Comunicações Code on Copyright and Related Rights (CDADC), Arts. 176, 178, 184 :$bPirate Bay Portugal. Decision of the Intellectual Property Court (Tribunal da Propriedade Intelectual) 24 February 2015 - Case No. 153/14.0YHLSB.
*260 $c2016.
*300 $a491-498.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v47 (4)
*520 $a1. Domain name blocking and the suspension of websites is an extreme and highly problematic measure in the light of human rights. 2. Blocking IP addresses is the most problematic, as not only the infringing site but also legitimate ones are blocked. Such goes beyond the balance and proportionality necessary to ensure the freedoms of information and expression. 3. Domain and sub-domain blocking (DNS blocking) is much less invasive or liable to cause damages or harm third parties, being therefore a more balanced solution.
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aTUOMIOISTUIMET
*653 $aPORTUGALI
*653 $aTIEDONSAANTIOIKEUS
*653 $aILMAISUVAPAUS
*653 $aBLOKKAUS
*653 $aIP ADDRESS BLOCKING
*653 $aDOMAIN BLOCKING
*653 $aBLOCKING INJUNCTIONS
*653 $aPROPORTIONALITY
*653 $aFREEDOM OF INFORMATION
*653 $aFREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
*8102 $aIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v4
*852 $hSA-II10$cAUDIOGEST
*85640$uhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-016-0479-4
*979 $a0000023456
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.