Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Neighbouring rights for publishers : are national and (possible) EU initiatives lawful?
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 47 (5)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. To tackle the financial difficulties facing the newspaper industry, different solutions have been advanced in Europe. These have resulted in either the conclusion of consensual agreements or the adoption of national legislative initiatives to create sui generis rights over news content. Currently also the EU Commission is considering whether a neighbouring right for publishers whether in the press sector alone or also other sectors should be proposed for adoption at the EU level. This contribution discusses: (1) the compatibility with EU law of national legislative initiatives that have resulted in the creation of sui generis rights for press publishers; and (2) whether a neighbouring right for publishers may be adopted at the EU level and, if so, what changes of the copyright acquis are required. It concludes that, while the former may be contrary to Member States obligations under EU law, the latter may be pursued by amending relevant Directives.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00002382nab a22004694a 4500
*00110776
*00520201106111827.0
*007tu
*008160822s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a23458
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000023458
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-II10
*1001 $aRosati, Eleonora.
*24510$aNeighbouring rights for publishers :$bare national and (possible) EU initiatives lawful? /$cEleonora Rosati.
*260 $c2016.
*300 $a569-594.
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v47 (5)
*520 $aTo tackle the financial difficulties facing the newspaper industry, different solutions have been advanced in Europe. These have resulted in either the conclusion of consensual agreements or the adoption of national legislative initiatives to create sui generis rights over news content. Currently also the EU Commission is considering whether a neighbouring right for publishers whether in the press sector alone or also other sectors should be proposed for adoption at the EU level. This contribution discusses: (1) the compatibility with EU law of national legislative initiatives that have resulted in the creation of sui generis rights for press publishers; and (2) whether a neighbouring right for publishers may be adopted at the EU level and, if so, what changes of the copyright acquis are required. It concludes that, while the former may be contrary to Member States obligations under EU law, the latter may be pursued by amending relevant Directives.
*650 7$alehtikustantajat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16772
*653 $aLÄHIOIKEUDET
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aKUSTANNUSALA
*653 $aKUSTANTAJAT
*653 $aKUSTANNUSTOIMI
*653 $aJULKAISEMINEN
*653 $aJULKAISIJAT
*653 $aJULKAISUTOIMINTA
*653 $aEU
*653 $aEU-MAAT
*653 $aEUROOPAN UNIONI
*653 $aSUI GENERIS
*653 $aANCILLARY COPYRIGHT
*653 $aANCILLARY RIGHTS
*653 $aCOPYRIGHT
*653 $aDSM-direktiivi
*653 $aDIRECTIVE 2001/29
*653 $aDIRECTIVE 2006/115EU COMISSION
*653 $aNEIGHBORING RIGHTS
*653 $alehtikustantajan lähioikeus
*8102 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v47 (5)
*852 $hSA-II10$cROSATI
*979 $a0000023458
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.