Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

*00001787nab a22003134a 4500
*00111156
*00520201106111828.0
*007tu
*008170117s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a23844
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000023844
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-CA30
*1001 $aFrye, Brian L.
*24510$aCopyright in Pantomime /$cBrian L. Frye.
*260  $c2016.
*300  $a307-355.
*4901 $aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(2)
*520  $aWhy does the Copyright Act specifically provide for the protection of “pantomimes”? This Article shows that the Copyright Act of 1976 amended the subject matter of copyright to include pantomimes simply in order to conform it to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. It further shows that the Berlin Act of 1909 amended the Berne Convention to provide for copyright protection of “les pantomimes” and “entertainments in dumb show” in order to ensure copyright protection of silent motion pictures. Unfortunately, the original purpose of providing copyright protection to “pantomimes” was forgotten. This Article argues that copyright protection of pantomimes is redundant on copyright protection of “motion pictures” and “dramatic works,” and reflects the carelessness of the drafters of the 1976 Act.
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aDRAMATURGIA
*653  $aESITYS
*653  $aESITTÄVÄT TAITEET
*653  $aPANTOMIIMI
*830 0$aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(2)
*852  $hSA-CA30$cFRYE
*85641$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Frye-Copyright-in-Pantomime.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979  $a0000023844
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^