Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, ISSN 0736-7694 ; 34(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Access to knowledge is a crucial part of the innovation paradigm, and its significance for development and progress is well recognized. Conversely, the role of errors, failures, and additional types of negative information in the dynamics of innovation is insufficiently explored in law and policy scholarship. This Article focuses on errors as drivers of innovation, and explores new ways for facilitating access to error. Drawing on multidisciplinary researchranging from philosophical accounts of progress through studies of complex systems to accumulating reflections from diverse scientific communitiesthis Article demonstrates that, counterintuitively, errors and innovation are inextricably linked. Yet, the principal legal, institutional, and social structures that regularly incentivize the diffusion of knowledge discourage rather than encourage the diffusion of errors. Intellectual property law, the primary mechanism for stimulating the dissemination of knowledge goods, is inherently limited in its ability to promote the dissemination of negative knowledge. The scientific establishment whose reputational rewards and institutional funding schemes complement and sometimes substitute intellectual property incentives offers no equal rewards when it comes to negative findings or falsifications. The result is insufficient access to negative knowledge, with acute and proven harms for innovation and progress. Against this analysis, this Article frames access-to-error as a pressing goal for innovation law and policy. It proposes a preliminary typology of negative information, and explores concrete policy measures to support an access-to-error paradigm concentrating on three possible mechanisms: adjustments to the intellectual property regime, top-down regulation, and a state-supported commons-based approach.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 0736-7694 ; 34(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Shur-Ofry-Access-to-Error.pdf Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*00002796nab a22003254a 4500
*00111157
*00520201106111828.0
*007tu
*008170117s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a23845
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000023845
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-CA30
*1001 $aShur-Ofry, Michal.
*24510$aAccess-to-Error /$cMichal Shur-Ofry.
*260 $c2016.
*300 $a357-400.
*4901 $aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(2)
*520 $aAccess to knowledge is a crucial part of the innovation paradigm, and its significance for development and progress is well recognized. Conversely, the role of errors, failures, and additional types of negative information in the dynamics of innovation is insufficiently explored in law and policy scholarship. This Article focuses on errors as drivers of innovation, and explores new ways for facilitating access to error. Drawing on multidisciplinary researchranging from philosophical accounts of progress through studies of complex systems to accumulating reflections from diverse scientific communitiesthis Article demonstrates that, counterintuitively, errors and innovation are inextricably linked. Yet, the principal legal, institutional, and social structures that regularly incentivize the diffusion of knowledge discourage rather than encourage the diffusion of errors. Intellectual property law, the primary mechanism for stimulating the dissemination of knowledge goods, is inherently limited in its ability to promote the dissemination of negative knowledge. The scientific establishment whose reputational rewards and institutional funding schemes complement and sometimes substitute intellectual property incentives offers no equal rewards when it comes to negative findings or falsifications. The result is insufficient access to negative knowledge, with acute and proven harms for innovation and progress. Against this analysis, this Article frames access-to-error as a pressing goal for innovation law and policy. It proposes a preliminary typology of negative information, and explores concrete policy measures to support an access-to-error paradigm concentrating on three possible mechanisms: adjustments to the intellectual property regime, top-down regulation, and a state-supported commons-based approach.
*653 $aTIEDONSAANTI
*653 $aTIETO
*653 $aSAATAVUUS
*653 $aINNOVAATIOT
*653 $aVIRHEET
*653 $aEREHDYKSET
*830 0$aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(2)
*852 $hSA-CA30$cSHUR-OFRY
*85641$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Shur-Ofry-Access-to-Error.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979 $a0000023845
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.