Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Copyright piracy and the indian film industry : a realist assessment
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • BANERJEE SA-CA30
Henkilönnimi
  • Banerjee, Arpan.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Copyright piracy and the indian film industry : a realist assessment
Julkaistu
  • 2016.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 611-698.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Cardozo arts & entertainment law journal, ISSN 0736-7694 ; 34(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä
  • CONTENT INTRODUCTION ........... 611 I. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS IPRS IN INDIA......................... 617 II. THE CONTOURS OF A REALIST APPROACH ....... 627 III. THE FIRST ELEMENT: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS REALISM...... 631 IV. THE SECOND ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING IPRS .......... 635 V. THE THIRD ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING COPYRIGHT................ 637 VI. THE FOURTH ELEMENT: THE INTERESTS OF THE FILM INDUSTRY 642 VII. THE FIFTH ELEMENT: THE WORKING OF THE PIRATE ECONOMY 650 VIII. THE SIXTH ELEMENT: THE LAW AND ITS ENFORCEMENT........ 660 IX. THE SEVENTH ELEMENT: REFORMS IN THE LAW AND INDUSTRY STRATEGIES...... 672 A. Camcording Laws ........................... 677 B. Preventive Detention Laws......................... 679 C. Graduated Response Systems............ 685 CONCLUSION............... 697
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • In India, the academic discourse surrounding intellectual property (IP) has been marked by great skepticism. Global IP laws have been viewed as a Western imposition detrimental to national interests. In this paper, I will make the case for a “realist” approach to film piracy in India, i.e., an approach that is rooted in legal pragmatism and draws from the New Legal Realism (NLR) movement. I will suggest a rough template for such an approach, referring to seven broad elements: a)international relations realism; b) contextualization of IP; c)contextualization of copyright; d) the views and interests of the film industry (including creators); e) the working of the pirate economy; f) the law and its enforcement; and g) reforms in the law and industry strategies. In keeping with the spirit of NLR, I will explore a range of top-down and bottom-up perspectives. I will conclude by commenting on the feasibility of certain legal reforms.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Cardozo arts & entertainment law journal, 0736-7694 ; 34(3)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/BANERJEE-ARTICLE.pdf Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*00002891nab a22003734a 4500
*00111432
*00520201106111831.0
*007tu
*008170418s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a24127
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000024127
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-CA30
*1001 $aBanerjee, Arpan.
*24510$aCopyright piracy and the indian film industry :$ba realist assessment  /$cArpan Banerjee.
*260  $c2016.
*300  $a611-698.
*4901 $aCardozo arts & entertainment law journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(3)
*505  $aCONTENT  INTRODUCTION ........... 611 I. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS IPRS IN INDIA......................... 617 II. THE CONTOURS OF A REALIST APPROACH ....... 627 III. THE FIRST ELEMENT: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS REALISM...... 631 IV. THE SECOND ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING IPRS .......... 635 V. THE THIRD ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING COPYRIGHT................ 637 VI. THE FOURTH ELEMENT: THE INTERESTS OF THE FILM INDUSTRY 642 VII. THE FIFTH ELEMENT: THE WORKING OF THE PIRATE ECONOMY 650 VIII. THE SIXTH ELEMENT: THE LAW AND ITS ENFORCEMENT........ 660 IX. THE SEVENTH ELEMENT: REFORMS IN THE LAW AND INDUSTRY STRATEGIES...... 672 A. Camcording Laws ........................... 677 B. Preventive Detention Laws......................... 679 C. Graduated Response Systems............ 685 CONCLUSION............... 697
*520  $aIn India, the academic discourse surrounding intellectual property (IP) has been marked by great skepticism. Global IP laws have been viewed as a Western imposition detrimental to national interests. In this paper, I will make the case for a “realist” approach to film piracy in India, i.e., an approach that is rooted in legal pragmatism and draws from the New Legal Realism (NLR) movement. I will suggest a rough template for such an approach, referring to seven broad elements: a)international relations realism; b) contextualization of IP; c)contextualization of copyright; d) the views and interests of the film industry (including creators); e) the working of the pirate economy; f) the law and its enforcement; and g) reforms in the law and industry strategies. In keeping with the spirit of NLR, I will explore a range of top-down and bottom-up perspectives. I will conclude by commenting on the feasibility of certain legal reforms.
*653  $aINTIA
*653  $aIMMATERIAALIOIKEUS
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653  $aPIRATISMI
*653  $aELOKUVA-ALA
*653  $aELOKUVATEOLLISUUS
*653  $aELOKUVATUOTANTO
*653  $aLAINSÄÄDÄNTÖ
*653  $aUUDISTUKSET
*653  $aKEHITTÄMINEN
*830 0$aCardozo arts & entertainment law journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(3)
*852  $hSA-CA30$cBANERJEE
*85641$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/BANERJEE-ARTICLE.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979  $a0000024127
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä