Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Copyright Piracy and the Indian Film Industry : a Realist Assessment
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, ISSN 0736-7694 ; 34(3)
Huomautus sisällöstä CONTENT INTRODUCTION ........... 611 I. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS IPRS IN INDIA......................... 617 II. THE CONTOURS OF A REALIST APPROACH ....... 627 III. THE FIRST ELEMENT: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS REALISM...... 631 IV. THE SECOND ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING IPRS .......... 635 V. THE THIRD ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING COPYRIGHT................ 637 VI. THE FOURTH ELEMENT: THE INTERESTS OF THE FILM INDUSTRY 642 VII. THE FIFTH ELEMENT: THE WORKING OF THE PIRATE ECONOMY 650 VIII. THE SIXTH ELEMENT: THE LAW AND ITS ENFORCEMENT........ 660 IX. THE SEVENTH ELEMENT: REFORMS IN THE LAW AND INDUSTRY STRATEGIES...... 672 A. Camcording Laws ........................... 677 B. Preventive Detention Laws......................... 679 C. Graduated Response Systems............ 685 CONCLUSION............... 697
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In India, the academic discourse surrounding intellectual property (IP) has been marked by great skepticism. Global IP laws have been viewed as a Western imposition detrimental to national interests. In this paper, I will make the case for a realist approach to film piracy in India, i.e., an approach that is rooted in legal pragmatism and draws from the New Legal Realism (NLR) movement. I will suggest a rough template for such an approach, referring to seven broad elements: a)international relations realism; b) contextualization of IP; c)contextualization of copyright; d) the views and interests of the film industry (including creators); e) the working of the pirate economy; f) the law and its enforcement; and g) reforms in the law and industry strategies. In keeping with the spirit of NLR, I will explore a range of top-down and bottom-up perspectives. I will conclude by commenting on the feasibility of certain legal reforms.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 0736-7694 ; 34(3)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/BANERJEE-ARTICLE.pdf Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*00002891nab a22003734a 4500
*00111432
*00520201106111831.0
*007tu
*008170418s2016\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a24127
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000024127
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-CA30
*1001 $aBanerjee, Arpan.
*24510$aCopyright Piracy and the Indian Film Industry :$ba Realist Assessment /$cArpan Banerjee.
*260 $c2016.
*300 $a611-698.
*4901 $aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(3)
*505 $aCONTENT INTRODUCTION ........... 611 I. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS IPRS IN INDIA......................... 617 II. THE CONTOURS OF A REALIST APPROACH ....... 627 III. THE FIRST ELEMENT: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS REALISM...... 631 IV. THE SECOND ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING IPRS .......... 635 V. THE THIRD ELEMENT: CONTEXTUALIZING COPYRIGHT................ 637 VI. THE FOURTH ELEMENT: THE INTERESTS OF THE FILM INDUSTRY 642 VII. THE FIFTH ELEMENT: THE WORKING OF THE PIRATE ECONOMY 650 VIII. THE SIXTH ELEMENT: THE LAW AND ITS ENFORCEMENT........ 660 IX. THE SEVENTH ELEMENT: REFORMS IN THE LAW AND INDUSTRY STRATEGIES...... 672 A. Camcording Laws ........................... 677 B. Preventive Detention Laws......................... 679 C. Graduated Response Systems............ 685 CONCLUSION............... 697
*520 $aIn India, the academic discourse surrounding intellectual property (IP) has been marked by great skepticism. Global IP laws have been viewed as a Western imposition detrimental to national interests. In this paper, I will make the case for a realist approach to film piracy in India, i.e., an approach that is rooted in legal pragmatism and draws from the New Legal Realism (NLR) movement. I will suggest a rough template for such an approach, referring to seven broad elements: a)international relations realism; b) contextualization of IP; c)contextualization of copyright; d) the views and interests of the film industry (including creators); e) the working of the pirate economy; f) the law and its enforcement; and g) reforms in the law and industry strategies. In keeping with the spirit of NLR, I will explore a range of top-down and bottom-up perspectives. I will conclude by commenting on the feasibility of certain legal reforms.
*653 $aINTIA
*653 $aIMMATERIAALIOIKEUS
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aPIRATISMI
*653 $aELOKUVA-ALA
*653 $aELOKUVATEOLLISUUS
*653 $aELOKUVATUOTANTO
*653 $aLAINSÄÄDÄNTÖ
*653 $aUUDISTUKSET
*653 $aKEHITTÄMINEN
*830 0$aCardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,$x0736-7694 ;$v34(3)
*852 $hSA-CA30$cBANERJEE
*85641$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/BANERJEE-ARTICLE.pdf$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979 $a0000024127
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.