Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Copyright, Doctrine and Evidence-Based Reform
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • GOMPEL SA-JIPI
Henkilönnimi
  • Gompel, Stef van.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Copyright, Doctrine and Evidence-Based Reform
Julkaistu
  • 2017.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 304-310.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 8 (4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Copyright lawmaking is conventionally embedded in a doctrinal tradition that gives much consideration to coherence and formal consistency with legal-theoretical foundations. This contrasts discernibly with the recent trend to base copyright policies and their elaboration into effective legal norms on empirical evidence. Recognizing that both approaches have their relative strengths and weaknesses, this paper explores how evidence-based policy can be reconciled with the traditional doctrinal approach to copyright lawmaking. It suggests that unproven doctrinal constellations that unnecessarily focus the legislative intention unequally on protecting copyright holders should be removed, but that lawmakers at the same time should also not stare blindly on economic evidence if legitimate claims based on fairness rationales are put forward, which also have to be weighed in as evidence.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4638/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_304_van_Gompel Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*00002074nab a22003494a 4500
*00111949
*00520201106111833.0
*008171227s2017\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a24662
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000024662
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-JIPI
*1001 $aGompel, Stef van.
*24510$aCopyright, Doctrine and Evidence-Based Reform /$cStef van Gompel.
*260  $c2017.
*300  $a304-310.
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v8 (4)
*520  $aCopyright lawmaking is conventionally embedded in a doctrinal tradition that gives much consideration to coherence and formal consistency with legal-theoretical foundations. This contrasts discernibly with the recent trend to base copyright policies and their elaboration into effective legal norms on empirical evidence. Recognizing that both approaches have their relative strengths and weaknesses, this paper explores how evidence-based policy can be reconciled with the traditional doctrinal approach to copyright lawmaking. It suggests that unproven doctrinal constellations that unnecessarily focus the legislative intention unequally on protecting copyright holders should be removed, but that lawmakers at the same time should also not stare blindly on economic evidence if legitimate claims based on fairness rationales are put forward, which also have to be weighed in as evidence.
*653  $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUSLAKI
*653  $aUUDISTUKSET
*653  $aLAINSÄÄDÄNTÖ
*653  $aLAINVALMISTELU
*653  $aCOPYRIGHT REFORM
*653  $aDOCTRINAL UNDERPINNINGS
*653  $aECONOMIC EVIDENCE
*653  $aEVIDENCE-BASED POLICY
*653  $aLAWMAKING APPROACHES
*8102 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v8(4)
*852  $hSA-JIPI$cGOMPEL
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4638/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_304_van_Gompel$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979  $a0000024662
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä