Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Collective Management of Copyrights between Competition, Regulation, and Monopolism : A Comparison of European and U.S. Approaches to Collective Management Organizations
Julkaistu Nomos Verlagsges.MBH + Co, Wien : 2017.
SAB-luokituskoodi
Muu luokituskoodi
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Studien Zum Unternehmens- Und Wirtschaftsrecht
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The collective management of copyrights has traditionally occupied a fundamental role in the exploitation of exclusive rights. Yet, the environment for collective management organizations (CMOs) like ASCAP and BMI has undergone profound changes in recent years; the question of how regulation should respond to these changes remains unresolved. Suggested answers oscillate between national monopolies for CMOs and free competition among these organizations. To contribute to this discussion, the present research deals with the collective management of copyrights and copyright regulation in the European Union and the United States. For this purpose, the legal status of CMOs is analyzed with regard to their relations to right holders, users, and other CMOs; a particular focus is put on antitrust law and sector-specific regulation. This research is conceived as a comparative study and defines concrete legal questions and juxtaposes the answers given by the two jurisdictions. In this way, the research discloses fundamental differences in the legal approaches to CMOs and highlights that these differences are rooted in historical developments, market structures, underlying substantive laws, and, to a certain extent, ideological conceptions. Moreover, it argues that statutory licensing poses a very similar problem and that a coherent solution is desirable. The paper concludes that both competition and monopolism are valid approaches to the collective management of copyrights if applied under the right circumstances and accompanied by appropriate regulation. The decision which and to what extent one of these approaches should be followed is essentially a legislative task that should keep in mind the different interests involved, applicable copyright legislation, and constitutional laws, as well as cultural diversity.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
ISBN
*00002941nam a22003374a 4500
*00112301
*00520201106111835.0
*008180319s2017\\\\xx\||||||||||\||||||eng|c
*020 $a (9783848748051)
*035 $a25019
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000025019
*0410 $aeng
*084 $a33.34$2ykl
*1001 $aMiernicki, Martin.
*24510$aCollective Management of Copyrights between Competition, Regulation, and Monopolism :$bA Comparison of European and U.S. Approaches to Collective Management Organizations /$cMartin Miernicki.
*260 $aWien :$bNomos Verlagsges.MBH + Co,$c2017.
*300 $a328 s.
*4901 $a Studien Zum Unternehmens- Und Wirtschaftsrecht
*520 $aThe collective management of copyrights has traditionally occupied a fundamental role in the exploitation of exclusive rights. Yet, the environment for collective management organizations (CMOs) like ASCAP and BMI has undergone profound changes in recent years; the question of how regulation should respond to these changes remains unresolved. Suggested answers oscillate between national monopolies for CMOs and free competition among these organizations. To contribute to this discussion, the present research deals with the collective management of copyrights and copyright regulation in the European Union and the United States. For this purpose, the legal status of CMOs is analyzed with regard to their relations to right holders, users, and other CMOs; a particular focus is put on antitrust law and sector-specific regulation. This research is conceived as a comparative study and defines concrete legal questions and juxtaposes the answers given by the two jurisdictions. In this way, the research discloses fundamental differences in the legal approaches to CMOs and highlights that these differences are rooted in historical developments, market structures, underlying substantive laws, and, to a certain extent, ideological conceptions. Moreover, it argues that statutory licensing poses a very similar problem and that a coherent solution is desirable. The paper concludes that both competition and monopolism are valid approaches to the collective management of copyrights if applied under the right circumstances and accompanied by appropriate regulation. The decision which and to what extent one of these approaches should be followed is essentially a legislative task that should keep in mind the different interests involved, applicable copyright legislation, and constitutional laws, as well as cultural diversity.
*653 $aHALLINTAJÄRJESTELMÄT
*653 $aTEKIJÄNOIKEUS
*653 $aKILPAILU
*653 $aSÄÄNTELY
*653 $aMONOPOLIT
*653 $aYHDYSVALLAT
*653 $aOIKEUSVERTAILU
*653 $aEU
*653 $aEUROOPAN UNIONI
*8102 $a Studien Zum Unternehmens- Und Wirtschaftsrecht
*852 $i9723381$h33.34$cMIERNICKI
*979 $a0000025019
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Book]$x0
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Kuvausta ei toistaiseksi saatavana