Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
Open science and codes of conduct on research integrity
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • LAINE SA-INF
Henkilönnimi
  • Laine, Heidi.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Open science and codes of conduct on research integrity
Julkaistu
  • 2018.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 48-74.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Informaatiotutkimus, ISSN 1797-9129 ; 37(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • The purpose of this article is to examine the conceptual alignment between the ethical principles of research integrity and open science. Research integrity is represented in this study by four general codes of conduct on responsible conduct of research (RCR), three of them international in scope, and one national. A representative list of ethical principles associated with open science is compiled in order to create categories for assessing the content of the codes. According to the analysis, the current understanding of RCR is too focused on traditional publications and the so called FFP definition of research misconduct to fully support open science. The main gaps include recognising citizen science and societal outreach and supporting open collaboration both among the research community and beyond its traditional borders. Updates for both the content of CoCs as well as the processes of creating such guidelines are suggested.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.77414 Linkki verkkoaineistoon 
*00001829nab a22003134a 4500
*00113101
*00520201106111840.0
*008190103s2018\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a25847
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000025847
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-INF
*1001 $aLaine, Heidi.
*24510$aOpen science and codes of conduct on research integrity /$cHeidi Laine.
*260  $c2018.
*300  $a48-74.
*4901 $aInformaatiotutkimus,$x1797-9129 ;$v37(4)
*520  $aThe purpose of this article is to examine the conceptual alignment between the ethical principles of research integrity and open science. Research integrity is represented in this study by four general codes of conduct on responsible conduct of research (RCR), three of them international in scope, and one national. A representative list of ethical principles associated with open science is compiled in order to create categories for assessing the content of the codes. According to the analysis, the current understanding of RCR is too focused on traditional publications and the so called FFP definition of research misconduct to fully support open science. The main gaps include recognising citizen science and societal outreach and supporting open collaboration both among the research community and beyond its traditional borders. Updates for both the content of CoCs as well as the processes of creating such guidelines are suggested.
*653  $aAVOIN TIEDE
*653  $aTUTKIMUSETIIKKA
*653  $aTUTKIMUSTYÖ
*653  $aOPEN SCIENCE
*653  $aRESEARCH ETHICS
*653  $aRESEARCH INTEGRITY
*8102 $aInformaatiotutkimus,$x1797-9129 ;$v4
*852  $hSA-INF$cLAINE
*85640$uhttps://doi.org/10.23978/inf.77414$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
*979  $a0000025847
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä