Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö A French Government View of Recent CJEU Case Law on Literary and Artistic Property
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Revue internationale du droit d'auteur, ISSN 0035-3515 ; 263
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Year after year while the EU directives have been increasingly unable to provide a comprehensive response to the challenges resulting from the development of new technologies, copyright has become an increasingly important part of the case-law dealt with by the CJEU. This has allowed the CJEU to adopt a very dynamic interpretation of the relevant copyright directives. Against this background, it has become crucial for Member States willing to influence the case-law from the CJEU to adopt a litigation strategy embedded in a very close analysis of the reasoning embraced by Union judges. This article intends to discuss these two elements in light of the approach relied on by the French government over the past decade.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
*00001233nab a22004094a 4500
*00114501
*00520201106111848.0
*007tu
*008200806s2020\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0fre|c
*035 $a27277
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000027277
*0410 $afre$aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-RE20
*1001 $aSegoin, Daniel.
*24512$aA French Government View of Recent CJEU Case Law on Literary and Artistic Property /$cDaniel Segoin.
*260 $c2020.
*300 $a5-73.
*4900 $aRevue internationale du droit d'auteur,$x0035-3515 ;$v263
*520 $aYear after year while the EU directives have been increasingly unable to provide a comprehensive response to the challenges resulting from the development of new technologies, copyright has become an increasingly important part of the case-law dealt with by the CJEU. This has allowed the CJEU to adopt a very dynamic interpretation of the relevant copyright directives. Against this background, it has become crucial for Member States willing to influence the case-law from the CJEU to adopt a litigation strategy embedded in a very close analysis of the reasoning embraced by Union judges. This article intends to discuss these two elements in light of the approach relied on by the French government over the past decade.
*653 $aEU
*653 $aPERUSOIKEUDET
*653 $aTUOMIOISTUIMET
*653 $aKANSAINVÄLISET SOPIMUKSET
*653 $aYLEISÖLLE VÄLITTÄMINEN
*653 $aKORVAUKSET
*653 $aRANSKA
*653 $aEUROPEAN UNION
*653 $aCHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EU
*653 $aCOURT
*653 $aINTERNATIONAL TREATIES
*653 $aCOMMUNICATION TO THE PUBLIC
*653 $aFAIR COMPENSATION FOR PRIVATE COPYING
*653 $aREMUNERATION
*653 $aCJEU
*852 $hSA-RE20$cSEGOIN
*979 $a0000027277
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.