Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Fixing Copyright Reform : A Better Solution to Online Infringement
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-JIPITEC
Henkilönnimi
  • Angelopoulos, Christina, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Fixing Copyright Reform : A Better Solution to Online Infringement
Julkaistu
  • 2019
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 147-172
  • (pdf)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, ISSN 2190-3387 ; 10(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • The newly-adopted Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSMD) will fundamentally reshape EU copyright law. Among its most controversial offerings is Article 17, the so-called “value gap” provision, aimed at solving the alleged mismatch between the value that online content-sharing platforms extract from creative content and the revenue returned to the copyright-holders. This article argues that the new rules are misguided, misconceiving the real problems afflicting modern copyright. These are the proliferation of copyright infringement online in general – not only through content-sharing platforms – and the current piecemeal harmonisation of the rules on the liability of the intermediaries whose services are used to access and disseminate copyright-protected content. The current outdated and fragmented EU legal framework is ill-equipped to address these problems. Instead, it creates legal uncertainty for users and intermediaries in the online environment, while also failing to compensate creators fairly. The new rules will not change this. This article examines the pre-DSMD acquis and proposes a better solution than Article 17, consisting of two key changes: (a) the introduction of a harmonised EU framework for accessory liability for third party copyright infringement; and (b) the adoption of an alternative compensation system for right-holders covering non-commercial direct copyright use by the end-users of certain online platforms.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi
  • Quintais, João Pedro.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2190-3387 ; 10(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-10-2-2019/4913/JIPITEC_10_2_2019_147_Angelopoulos_and_Quintais Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000      ab a        ar
*00114985
*008      s2019||||fi |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aAngelopoulos, Christina,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aFixing Copyright Reform :$bA Better Solution to Online Infringement /$cby Christina Angelopoulos and João Pedro Quintais
*260  $c2019
*300  $as. 147-172
*300  $a(pdf)
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338  $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v10(2)
*520  $aThe newly-adopted Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSMD) will fundamentally reshape EU copyright law. Among its most controversial offerings is Article 17, the so-called “value gap” provision, aimed at solving the alleged mismatch between the value that online content-sharing platforms extract from creative content and the revenue returned to the copyright-holders. This article argues that the new rules are misguided, misconceiving the real problems afflicting modern copyright. These are the proliferation of copyright infringement online in general – not only through content-sharing platforms – and the current piecemeal harmonisation of the rules on the liability of the intermediaries whose services are used to access and disseminate copyright-protected content. The current outdated and fragmented EU legal framework is ill-equipped to address these problems. Instead, it creates legal uncertainty for users and intermediaries in the online environment, while also failing to compensate creators fairly. The new rules will not change this. This article examines the pre-DSMD acquis and proposes a better solution than Article 17, consisting of two key changes: (a) the introduction of a harmonised EU framework for accessory liability for third party copyright infringement; and (b) the adoption of an alternative compensation system for right-holders covering non-commercial direct copyright use by the end-users of certain online platforms.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$akuluttajaoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14785$2yso/fin
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*650 7$akorvaukset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4223$2yso/fin
*653  $aenforcement
*653  $aintermediaries
*653  $aend-user rights
*653  $aarvokuilu
*7001 $aQuintais, João Pedro.
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,$x2190-3387 ;$v10(2)
*852  $hSA-JIPITEC
*85640$uhttps://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-10-2-2019/4913/JIPITEC_10_2_2019_147_Angelopoulos_and_Quintais$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä