Hylly SA-The Journal of world intellectual property
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Does TRIPS (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) prevent COVID-19 vaccines as a global public good?
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa The Journal of World Intellectual Property, ISSN 1422-2213 ; 24 (3-4)
Huomautus sisällöstä The article analyses the global public goods approach to COVID-19 technologies, embedded in 2020 affirmations by the World Health Assembly (WHA), the UN Human Rights Council and G20 on broad immunization against COVID-19 . After identifying the access to COVID-19 tools (ACT) Accelerator members, the UN efforts are identified, focusing primarily on the UN human rights bodies, acknowledging how these and the WHA have mutually reinforced each others' efforts. The article finds that the global public goods terminology appeared in UN resolutions in 2020, while wording that included vaccines—on an equal footing as medicines—appeared in 2016, and recognition of generic medicines appeared in 2019. The so-called Trilateral Cooperation on IP and public health between two UN specialized agencies and the World Trade Organization (WTO) has increased awareness of the flexibilities within WTO's TRIPS Agreement. These flexibilities are explained. With notable exceptions, like India, these flexibilities are not widely applied in domestic legislation. A different emphasis characterizes the millennium development goals era as compared to the sustainable development goals era, and this shift is explained by applying relevant theories. Among pro-TRIPS developed countries there is an acknowledgment of obstacles created by the IP system, but their overall position has not changed.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12187 Open access
*000 ab a ar
*00115261
*008 s ||||fi |||||||||||||||||eng||
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aHaugen, Hans Morten
*24510$aDoes TRIPS (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) prevent COVID-19 vaccines as a global public good? /$cHans Morten Haugen
*260 $c2021
*300 $as. 195-220.
*300 $aPDF
*490 $aThe Journal of World Intellectual Property,$x1422-2213 ;$v24 (3-4)
*505 $aThe article analyses the global public goods approach to COVID-19 technologies, embedded in 2020 affirmations by the World Health Assembly (WHA), the UN Human Rights Council and G20 on broad immunization against COVID-19 . After identifying the access to COVID-19 tools (ACT) Accelerator members, the UN efforts are identified, focusing primarily on the UN human rights bodies, acknowledging how these and the WHA have mutually reinforced each others' efforts. The article finds that the global public goods terminology appeared in UN resolutions in 2020, while wording that included vaccines—on an equal footing as medicines—appeared in 2016, and recognition of generic medicines appeared in 2019. The so-called Trilateral Cooperation on IP and public health between two UN specialized agencies and the World Trade Organization (WTO) has increased awareness of the flexibilities within WTO's TRIPS Agreement. These flexibilities are explained. With notable exceptions, like India, these flexibilities are not widely applied in domestic legislation. A different emphasis characterizes the millennium development goals era as compared to the sustainable development goals era, and this shift is explained by applying relevant theories. Among pro-TRIPS developed countries there is an acknowledgment of obstacles created by the IP system, but their overall position has not changed.
*653 $aaccess to COVID19 tools accelerator
*653 $ageneric medicines
*653 $apublic health and trade
*653 $asustainable development goals
*653 $atrilateral cooperation on IP
*852 $hSA-The Journal of world intellectual property
*85640$uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12187$yOpen access
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.