Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

*000      am a        a
*00115296
*008      |2021    ne     e|     ||| 0|eng||
*020  $a978-90-04-43763-0
*041  $aeng
*084  $a33$2ykl
*1001 $aSymeonides, Symeon C. 
*24510$aCross-border infringement of personality rights via the internet:$ba resolution of the institute of international law/$cSymeon C. Symeonides
*264  $aLeiden :$bBrill | Nijhoff,$c2021.
*300  $a408 s.
*505  $aPart A De Lege Lata; Chapter I The Internet; Chapter II The Scope of This Book; Chapter III Substantive Law Differences; Chapter IV Jurisdictional Differences; Chapter V Jurisdictional Differences in Cases involving Injuries to Rights of Personality; Chapter VI Differences and Similarities in Choice of Law; Chapter VII Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments; Part B De Lege Ferenda: The Resolution of the Institute of International Law; Chapter I Introduction; Chapter II The Resolution (with Comments); Chapter III The Resolution (without Comments); Chapter IV Résolution (Traduction);  Chapter V TRAVAUX PREPARATOIRES: Excerpts from Correspondence between Reporters and Members of the Eighth Commission; Chapter VI Excerpts from the Minutes of The Hague Session of the Institute of International Law, The Hague, August 25–31, 2019; Appendices: Appendix 1 Statutory Choice-of-Law Rules on Infringement of Personality Rights and Similar Torts; Appendix 2 Substantive Provisions on Rights of Personality; Appendix 3 Excerpts from the Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters of 2 July 2019; Appendix 4 Miscellaneous Other Provisions; Appendix 5 The Internet and Human Rights
*520  $aConflicts of laws arising from injuries to rights of personality—such as defamation or invasion of privacy—have always been difficult, if only because they implicate conflicting societal values about the rights of freedom of speech and access to information, on the one hand, and protection of reputation and privacy, on the other hand. The ubiquity of the internet has dramatically increased the frequency and intensity of these conflicts.
*650 7$ayksilönsuoja$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3637
*650 7$ayksityisyys$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10909$2yso/fin
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*650 7$akansainvälinen oikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12347
*653  $across-border
*852  $c33 SYM
^

Conflicts of laws arising from injuries to rights of personality—such as defamation or invasion of privacy—have always been difficult, if only because they implicate conflicting societal values about the rights of freedom of speech and access to information, on the one hand, and protection of reputation and privacy, on the other hand. The ubiquity of the internet has dramatically increased the frequency and intensity of these conflicts. This book explores the ways in which various Western countries have addressed these conflicts, but also advances new, practical ideas about how these conflicts should be resolved. These ideas are part of an international model law unanimously adopted by a Resolution of the Institut de droit international , which addresses jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. The book provides extensive article-by-article commentary, which explains the philosophy and intended operation of the Resolution.