Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

 
“CV-Online Latvia” : Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 3 June 2021 – Case No. C-762/19
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-IIC
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • “CV-Online Latvia” : Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 3 June 2021 – Case No. C-762/19
Julkaistu
  • 2021
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 1098
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 52(8)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Article 7(1) and (2) of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases must be interpreted as meaning that an internet search engine specialising in searching the contents of databases, which copies and indexes the whole or a substantial part of a database freely accessible on the internet and then allows its users to search that database on its own website according to criteria relevant to its content, is ‘extracting’ and ‘re-utilising’ that content within the meaning of that provision, which may be prohibited by the maker of such a database where those acts adversely affect its investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of that content, namely that they constitute a risk to the possibility of redeeming that investment through the normal operation of the database in question, which it is for the referring court to verify.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 52(8) 
*000      ab a        ar
*00116498
*008      s2021||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*041  $aeng
*24500$a“CV-Online Latvia” :$bDecision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 3 June 2021 – Case No. C-762/19 /$c‘CV-Online Latvia’ SIA v. ‘Melons’ SIA Directive 96/9/EC, Art. 7.
*260  $c2021
*300  $as. 1098
*4900 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v52(8)
*520  $aArticle 7(1) and (2) of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases must be interpreted as meaning that an internet search engine specialising in searching the contents of databases, which copies and indexes the whole or a substantial part of a database freely accessible on the internet and then allows its users to search that database on its own website according to criteria relevant to its content, is ‘extracting’ and ‘re-utilising’ that content within the meaning of that provision, which may be prohibited by the maker of such a database where those acts adversely affect its investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of that content, namely that they constitute a risk to the possibility of redeeming that investment through the normal operation of the database in question, which it is for the referring court to verify.
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*650 7$atietokannat$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3056$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*651 7$aLatvia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94259
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v52(8)
*852  $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä