Hylly
Henkilönnimi Zhang Yurong, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö A Study on Punitive Damages for the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in China
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 43(7)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The punitive damages system plays a vital role in compensating intellectual property (IP) holders for damages, fighting against malicious infringement and promoting innovation. To reduce the increasing infringement of intellectual property rights (IPRs), China has introduced punitive damages in IP legal system since 2013. However, the conditions for the application of punitive damages in judicial practice are still very controversial, including how to identify “malicious” or “intentional” infringement and “serious circumstances” as well as the calculation of damages. This article explains the background of China’s punitive damages system for the infringement of IPRs, focuses on the judicial application of punitive damages in the field of trademark law and analyses important disputes. The introduction of punitive damages conforms to the trend of further strengthening IPRs protection in China and is beneficial to technological progress and innovation.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 43(7)
*000 ab a ar
*00116702
*008 s2021||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aZhang Yurong,$ekirjoittaja.
*24512$aA Study on Punitive Damages for the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in China /$cYurong Zhang.
*260 $c2021
*300 $as. 433-439
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v43(7)
*520 $aThe punitive damages system plays a vital role in compensating intellectual property (IP) holders for damages, fighting against malicious infringement and promoting innovation. To reduce the increasing infringement of intellectual property rights (IPRs), China has introduced punitive damages in IP legal system since 2013. However, the conditions for the application of punitive damages in judicial practice are still very controversial, including how to identify “malicious” or “intentional” infringement and “serious circumstances” as well as the calculation of damages. This article explains the background of China’s punitive damages system for the infringement of IPRs, focuses on the judicial application of punitive damages in the field of trademark law and analyses important disputes. The introduction of punitive damages conforms to the trend of further strengthening IPRs protection in China and is beneficial to technological progress and innovation.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$avahingonkorvaus $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p18222
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*651 7$aKiina$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104984
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v43(7)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.