Hylly
Henkilönnimi Sherwood-Edwards, Mark, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Google v Oracle : Copyright Myths and the Evisceration of Copyright
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 43(9)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Oracle spent years developing a programming library that successfully attracted software developers, thus enhancing the value of Oracle’s products. Google sought a license to use the library in Android, the operating system it was developing for mobile phones. But when the companies could not agree on terms, Google simply copied verbatim 11,500 lines of code from the library. As a result, it erased 97.5% of the value of Oracle’s partnership with Amazon, made tens of billions of dollars, and established its position as the owner of the largest mobile operating system in the world. Despite this, the majority of the US Supreme Court holds that this copying was fair use.
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 43(9)
*000 ab a ar
*00116741
*008 s2021||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aSherwood-Edwards, Mark,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aGoogle v Oracle :$bCopyright Myths and the Evisceration of Copyright /$cMark Sherwood-Edwards.
*260 $c2021
*300 $as. 609-611
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v43(9)
*520 $aOracle spent years developing a programming library that successfully attracted software developers, thus enhancing the value of Oracle’s products. Google sought a license to use the library in Android, the operating system it was developing for mobile phones. But when the companies could not agree on terms, Google simply copied verbatim 11,500 lines of code from the library. As a result, it erased 97.5% of the value of Oracle’s partnership with Amazon, made tens of billions of dollars, and established its position as the owner of the largest mobile operating system in the world. Despite this, the majority of the US Supreme Court holds that this copying was fair use.
*650 7$aohjelmistotuotanto$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17097$2yso/fin
*650 7$ahakuohjelmat$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6999$2yso/fin
*650 7$aGoogle $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p22952$2yso/fin
*650 7$alisenssit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16495$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v43(9)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.