Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö "Closed Facebook Group" : Decision of the Supreme Court of Austria (Oberster Gerichtshof) 2 July 2020 – Case No. 4 Ob 89/20x
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 53(6)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1. Making a copy available to the public excludes the making of a copy for private use under Sec. 42(5) Copyright Act. 2. The exception for the private copy under Sec. 42 Copyright Act can therefore not be considered as a justification for the right to make available under Sec. 18a of the Act. 3. Making available to the public can only be denied if the making available is either limited to specific persons who are connected to each other by a personal relationship and therefore belong to a private group, or if the de minimis threshold to be determined in the individual case is not exceeded in terms of the size of the group (number of members). 4. There can only be a private Facebook group if a personal connecting characteristic between the group members in the sense of a special interest or a special purpose is given from the outset; if a group administrator only allows admission to the group if this characteristic exists; and if participation is only possible as long as the connecting characteristic exists. Furthermore, a certain maximum number of group members – to be determined according to the purpose of the group – must not be exceeded. 5. It cannot be concluded at the outset that the posting of a protected photograph in a “closed” Facebook group does constitute communication to the public simply because said group is “closed”. Rather, it must be assessed in the individual case whether the abovementioned criteria are met.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 53(6)
*000 ab a ar
*00117183
*008 s2022||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a"Closed Facebook Group" :$bDecision of the Supreme Court of Austria (Oberster Gerichtshof) 2 July 2020 – Case No. 4 Ob 89/20x /$cCopyright Act, Secs. 18a and 42.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2022.
*300 $as. 964–968
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(6)
*520 $a1. Making a copy available to the public excludes the making of a copy for private use under Sec. 42(5) Copyright Act. 2. The exception for the private copy under Sec. 42 Copyright Act can therefore not be considered as a justification for the right to make available under Sec. 18a of the Act. 3. Making available to the public can only be denied if the making available is either limited to specific persons who are connected to each other by a personal relationship and therefore belong to a private group, or if the de minimis threshold to be determined in the individual case is not exceeded in terms of the size of the group (number of members). 4. There can only be a private Facebook group if a personal connecting characteristic between the group members in the sense of a special interest or a special purpose is given from the outset; if a group administrator only allows admission to the group if this characteristic exists; and if participation is only possible as long as the connecting characteristic exists. Furthermore, a certain maximum number of group members – to be determined according to the purpose of the group – must not be exceeded. 5. It cannot be concluded at the outset that the posting of a protected photograph in a “closed” Facebook group does constitute communication to the public simply because said group is “closed”. Rather, it must be assessed in the individual case whether the abovementioned criteria are met.
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$atekijänoikeus laki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*651 7$aItävalta$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105294
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(6)
*852 $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.