Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö "Ales v. HP ESI" : Decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation of Italy, Civil Division, Section I (Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Sez. I Civ) 15 July 2021 – Case No. 20250/2021
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 53(7)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1. Article 64quater(2)(c) of Law No. 633/1941 prohibits licensees from using information obtained by reproducing the source code “for developing, producing or marketing a computer program that is substantially similar in its expressive form, or for any other activity that infringes copyright”. 2. However, once the creativity of a reproduced work has been established, the protection afforded by the above rule can be invoked only if the licensee’s reproduction results in a product that is “similar in its expressive form”.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 53(7)
*000 ab a ar
*00117186
*008 s2022||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a"Ales v. HP ESI" :$bDecision of the Supreme Court of Cassation of Italy, Civil Division, Section I (Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Sez. I Civ) 15 July 2021 – Case No. 20250/2021 /$cAles S.r.L v. HP Enterprise Services Italia S.r.L. Italian Copyright Statute (Law No. 633/1941), Art. 64quater; Civil Code, Arts. 1175, 1375, 2598.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2022.
*300 $as. 1131–1133
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(7)
*520 $a1. Article 64quater(2)(c) of Law No. 633/1941 prohibits licensees from using information obtained by reproducing the source code “for developing, producing or marketing a computer program that is substantially similar in its expressive form, or for any other activity that infringes copyright”. 2. However, once the creativity of a reproduced work has been established, the protection afforded by the above rule can be invoked only if the licensee’s reproduction results in a product that is “similar in its expressive form”.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus laki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$atuomiot$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3192$2yso/fin
*651 7$aItalia$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105111$2yso/fin
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v53(7)
*852 $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.