Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection : A Comparative Analysis of AI Regulation through the Lens of Data Protection in the EU and Brazil
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-GRUR International
Henkilönnimi
  • Pinheiro, Patricia Peck, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection : A Comparative Analysis of AI Regulation through the Lens of Data Protection in the EU and Brazil
Julkaistu
  • Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 924–932
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 71(10)
Yleinen huomautus
  • Special Issue ‘The Regulation of the Digital Economy – Competition Law, Data Protection, and Intellectual Property Issues’
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) is already a major part of our daily lives. From unlocking our smartphones with our faces to receiving film recommendations on streaming platforms, AI is part of our routines. In recent years, a widespread adoption of AI technologies both by public and private agencies has been observed. Notwithstanding the many conveniences it has created, the use of AI also involves many risks for people individually and for society as a whole. For instance, it may jeopardise fundamental rights such as privacy and data protection or even intensify existing discrimination against minorities. For this reason, various nations are now facing the challenge of regulating AI without limiting its development. In terms of data protection, the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been consistently applied and enforced in the European Union (EU) and has inspired many other data protection laws that came after it, such as the one in Brazil. In Brazil, the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) has finally come into force and is slowly being enforced. In 2021, a series of legislative initiatives concerning the development and use of AI systems drew the attention of governments, academics and the tech industry around the world. In the EU, the European Commission released a proposal for regulation in April that presents harmonised rules on AI. Meanwhile, in Brazil, in September, the Chamber of Deputies approved a rather superficial bill aiming to regulate AI in the country. Thus, one can wonder: what is the impact of data protection laws on AI regulations? And how could Brazil benefit once again from following the EU’s lead on regulating AI? In order to answer these questions, this article begins by explaining the concept of AI. It then presents the relation between AI and privacy and data protection as well as the main principles that guide privacy and data protection under both EU and Brazilian data protection laws. Subsequently, it introduces the EU legal framework for AI and focuses on the risk-based approach. Later, it presents the proposed Brazilian bill, focusing on its main principles from a comparative perspective with the EU. Finally, it will conclude how Brazil can benefit from taking inspiration from the EU experience on AI regulation.
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi
  • Battaglini, Helen Batista, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 71(10)
*000      ab a        ar
*00117197
*008      s2022||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aPinheiro, Patricia Peck,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aArtificial Intelligence and Data Protection :$bA Comparative Analysis of AI Regulation through the Lens of Data Protection in the EU and Brazil /$cPatricia Peck Pinheiro, Helen Batista Battaglini.
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2022.
*300  $as. 924–932
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v71(10)
*500  $aSpecial Issue ‘The Regulation of the Digital Economy – Competition Law, Data Protection, and Intellectual Property Issues’
*520  $aArtificial intelligence (AI) is already a major part of our daily lives. From unlocking our smartphones with our faces to receiving film recommendations on streaming platforms, AI is part of our routines. In recent years, a widespread adoption of AI technologies both by public and private agencies has been observed. Notwithstanding the many conveniences it has created, the use of AI also involves many risks for people individually and for society as a whole. For instance, it may jeopardise fundamental rights such as privacy and data protection or even intensify existing discrimination against minorities. For this reason, various nations are now facing the challenge of regulating AI without limiting its development. In terms of data protection, the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been consistently applied and enforced in the European Union (EU) and has inspired many other data protection laws that came after it, such as the one in Brazil. In Brazil, the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) has finally come into force and is slowly being enforced. In 2021, a series of legislative initiatives concerning the development and use of AI systems drew the attention of governments, academics and the tech industry around the world. In the EU, the European Commission released a proposal for regulation in April that presents harmonised rules on AI. Meanwhile, in Brazil, in September, the Chamber of Deputies approved a rather superficial bill aiming to regulate AI in the country. Thus, one can wonder: what is the impact of data protection laws on AI regulations? And how could Brazil benefit once again from following the EU’s lead on regulating AI? In order to answer these questions, this article begins by explaining the concept of AI. It then presents the relation between AI and privacy and data protection as well as the main principles that guide privacy and data protection under both EU and Brazilian data protection laws. Subsequently, it introduces the EU legal framework for AI and focuses on the risk-based approach. Later, it presents the proposed Brazilian bill, focusing on its main principles from a comparative perspective with the EU. Finally, it will conclude how Brazil can benefit from taking inspiration from the EU experience on AI regulation.
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$atietosuojalaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p38506
*650 7$atietosuoja$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3636$2yso/fin
*650 7$ateknologinen kehitys$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8956
*653  $aBrasilia
*653  $aGDPR
*7001 $aBattaglini, Helen Batista,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v71(10)
*852  $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-GRUR International