Hylly SA-Entertainment Law Review
Henkilönnimi Heeley, Rachael, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Domino Effect : Four Tet Allowed to Add Heads of Claim in Dispute with his Label
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Entertainment Law Review, ISSN 0959-3799 ; 33(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In proceedings which touch on significant issues for the recording industry, the IPEC in Hebden v Domino Recording Company Ltd granted a recording artist permission to add additional heads of claim, introducing additional allegations of breach by the label of a recording agreement. The artist had claimed breach of a digital release commitment and reversion of copyright on an alleged repudiatory breach. The court could not decide summarily that the claims faced no real likelihood of success, and so found no need to address the label's application for summary judgment.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Entertainment Law Review, 0959-3799 ; 33(4)
*000 ab a ar
*00117440
*008 s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aHeeley, Rachael,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aDomino Effect :$bFour Tet Allowed to Add Heads of Claim in Dispute with his Label /$cRachael Heeley.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2022.
*300 $as. 161-166
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v33(4)
*520 $aIn proceedings which touch on significant issues for the recording industry, the IPEC in Hebden v Domino Recording Company Ltd granted a recording artist permission to add additional heads of claim, introducing additional allegations of breach by the label of a recording agreement. The artist had claimed breach of a digital release commitment and reversion of copyright on an alleged repudiatory breach. The court could not decide summarily that the claims faced no real likelihood of success, and so found no need to address the label's application for summary judgment.
*650 7$amusiikkiteollisuus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14669$2yso/fin
*650 7$amusiikki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1808
*650 7$alevy-yhtiöt $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8350
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$aäänitteet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12687
*650 7$aääniteteollisuus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8351
*650 7$adigitaaliset tallenteet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2164
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$asopimukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3356
*651 7$aIso-Britannia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104990
*830 0$aEntertainment Law Review,$x0959-3799 ;$v33(4)
*852 $hSA-Entertainment Law Review
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.