Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

A Cushty Decision - Scope for Copyright in a Character as a Literary Work
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-EIPR
Henkilönnimi
  • Heeley, Rachael, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • A Cushty Decision - Scope for Copyright in a Character as a Literary Work
Julkaistu
  • Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 745-749
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 44(12)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Shazam Productions, a company set up by the creator of the classic sitcom Only Fools and Horses, successfully sued the operators of a themed dining experience named "Only Fools The (Cushty) Dining Experience". The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court ruled that the experience infringed Shazam's copyright. In a novel decision, the IPEC held that the lead characters Del Boy and Rodney, with their distictive character traits, were literary works. It found that each script of the TV sitcom was a dramatic work and rejected defences of parody and pastiche. It also considered that the actors' dress and appearance and the defendants' use of an "Only Fools" domain name amounted to passing-off.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Henkilönnimi
  • Wilson, Andrew, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 44(12)
*000      ab a        ar
*00117555
*008      s2022||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aHeeley, Rachael,$ekirjoittaja.
*24512$aA Cushty Decision - Scope for Copyright in a Character as a Literary Work /$cRachael Heeley, Andrew Wilson.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2022.
*300  $as. 745-749
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v44(12)
*520  $aShazam Productions, a company set up by the creator of the classic sitcom Only Fools and Horses, successfully sued the operators of a themed dining experience named "Only Fools The (Cushty) Dining Experience". The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court ruled that the experience infringed Shazam's copyright. In a novel decision, the IPEC held that the lead characters Del Boy and Rodney, with their distictive character traits, were literary works. It found that each script of the TV sitcom was a dramatic work and rejected defences of parody and pastiche. It also considered that the actors' dress and appearance and the defendants' use of an "Only Fools" domain name amounted to passing-off.
*650 7$akirjalliset teokset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1150$2yso/fin
*650 7$afiktiiviset hahmot$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1273$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$aravintolat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1634
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*651 7$aIso-Britannia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104990
*7001 $aWilson, Andrew,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v44(12)
*852  $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-EIPR