Henkilönnimi Okediji, Ruth L., kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Is the Public Domain Just? : Biblical Stewardship and Legal Protection For Traditional Knowledge Assets
Julkaistu Columbia Law School, New York : 2022.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, ISSN 2161-9271 ; 45(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The present debate over the legal treatment of traditional knowledge (TK) and genetic resources tends to rationalize the precarious conditions in which Indigenous peoples and local communities live. The debate is organized around the question whether TK should be treated as part of the public domain or whether property rights should apply. Both sides presuppose either a robust utilitarianism or else a narrow conception of historical redress for past injustices. This Article argues that both property and the public domain depend on the disruption of places, people, and cultures that may stand in the way of the material conditions industrialized societies use as a proxy for human welfare. The TK debate tends to avoid fundamental moral and justice-related aspects of TK protection, including the centrality of TK to Indigenous peoples’ cultural identities and ways (and quality) of life, as well as their long-term socioeconomic development. The Article proposes a theological framework of “biblical stewardship” rooted in imago Dei—the foundational concept informing Jewish and Christian understandings of human nature and social interaction—to address the socio-moral dimensions that are constitutive of TK systems and the institutional context in which they unfold. The biblical stewardship framework focuses on the cooperative and kinship arrangements that enable and sustain productive capacity for TK. It centers the need for Indigenous peoples and local communities to be able to develop and protect their knowledge assets as a precondition for those communities’ thriving, both in the present and the future. Moreover, biblical stewardship supplies a basis for accountability by Indigenous peoples and local communities for how their TK is managed, shared, and utilized within a broader framework of progress and the public good—including obligations that foreclose access and benefit-sharing agreements that may undermine conditions for flourishing of plant, animal, or human life.
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke The Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 2161-9271 ; 45(4)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v45i4.10076 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00117599
*008 s2022||||xxu|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041 $aeng
*1001 $aOkediji, Ruth L.,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aIs the Public Domain Just? :$bBiblical Stewardship and Legal Protection For Traditional Knowledge Assets /$cRuth L. Okediji.
*264 1$aNew York :$bColumbia Law School,$c2022.
*300 $a1 verkkoaineisto (65 s.)
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338 $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aThe Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,$x2161-9271 ;$v45(4)
*520 $aThe present debate over the legal treatment of traditional knowledge (TK) and genetic resources tends to rationalize the precarious conditions in which Indigenous peoples and local communities live. The debate is organized around the question whether TK should be treated as part of the public domain or whether property rights should apply. Both sides presuppose either a robust utilitarianism or else a narrow conception of historical redress for past injustices. This Article argues that both property and the public domain depend on the disruption of places, people, and cultures that may stand in the way of the material conditions industrialized societies use as a proxy for human welfare. The TK debate tends to avoid fundamental moral and justice-related aspects of TK protection, including the centrality of TK to Indigenous peoples’ cultural identities and ways (and quality) of life, as well as their long-term socioeconomic development. The Article proposes a theological framework of “biblical stewardship” rooted in imago Dei—the foundational concept informing Jewish and Christian understandings of human nature and social interaction—to address the socio-moral dimensions that are constitutive of TK systems and the institutional context in which they unfold. The biblical stewardship framework focuses on the cooperative and kinship arrangements that enable and sustain productive capacity for TK. It centers the need for Indigenous peoples and local communities to be able to develop and protect their knowledge assets as a precondition for those communities’ thriving, both in the present and the future. Moreover, biblical stewardship supplies a basis for accountability by Indigenous peoples and local communities for how their TK is managed, shared, and utilized within a broader framework of progress and the public good—including obligations that foreclose access and benefit-sharing agreements that may undermine conditions for flourishing of plant, animal, or human life.
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$akulttuuriperintö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8475
*650 7$aalkuperäiskansat $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5737$2yso/fin
*830 0$aThe Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts,$x2161-9271 ;$v45(4)
*85640$uhttps://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v45i4.10076$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.