Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö "Porsche 911" : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) 17 April 2022 – Case No. I ZR 222/20; ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:070422UIZR222.20.0
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 54(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. a) The term “use” within the meaning of Sec. 32a(1) sentence 1 Copyright Act is to be interpreted to the effect that income or benefits from a use which does not encroach on the scope of protection of an author’s exploitation right cannot give rise to a claim under Sec. 32a(1) sentence 1 Copyright Act for further equitable participation on the part of the author. b) The principles developed by the Federal Supreme Court to distinguish free use from (non-free) adaptation continue to apply to works within the meaning of Sec. 2 Copyright Act after the deletion of Sec. 24 Copyright Act old version and the amendment of Sec. 23 Copyright Act through the Act on the Adaptation of Copyright Law to the Requirements of the Digital Single Market of 31 May 2021 (Federal Gazette I p. 1204), subject to the proviso that the criterion of “fading into the background” is to be understood in conformity with EU law in the sense of the criterion of a lack of recognisability of the creative elements giving rise to protection.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 54(1)
*000 ab a ar
*00117868
*008 s2023||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a"Porsche 911" :$bDecision of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) 17 April 2022 – Case No. I ZR 222/20; ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:070422UIZR222.20.0 /$cCopyright Act, Secs. 16, 17, 23(1), 24(1), 32a(1); Directive 2001/29/EC, Art. 2(a).
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2023.
*300 $as. 102–118
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(1)
*520 $aa) The term “use” within the meaning of Sec. 32a(1) sentence 1 Copyright Act is to be interpreted to the effect that income or benefits from a use which does not encroach on the scope of protection of an author’s exploitation right cannot give rise to a claim under Sec. 32a(1) sentence 1 Copyright Act for further equitable participation on the part of the author. b) The principles developed by the Federal Supreme Court to distinguish free use from (non-free) adaptation continue to apply to works within the meaning of Sec. 2 Copyright Act after the deletion of Sec. 24 Copyright Act old version and the amendment of Sec. 23 Copyright Act through the Act on the Adaptation of Copyright Law to the Requirements of the Digital Single Market of 31 May 2021 (Federal Gazette I p. 1204), subject to the proviso that the criterion of “fading into the background” is to be understood in conformity with EU law in the sense of the criterion of a lack of recognisability of the creative elements giving rise to protection.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$amallisuoja $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14238$2yso/fin
*650 7$aautot$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1223$2yso/fin
*651 7$aSaksa$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105087$2yso/fin
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(1)
*852 $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.