Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö “Verdens Gang” : Decision of the Supreme Court of Norway 2 June 2022 – Case No. HR-2022-1113-A
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 54(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. 1. The use by a newspaper of photographs taken from a law firm's website and from an open Facebook profile without consent and without paying a remuneration is to be assessed under the current event rule in Sec. 36 subsection 2 of the Copyright Act and not under the rule on the right of quotation in Sec. 29. 2. Here it was found that: The newspaper’s use of the photographs has a legal basis in Sec. 36 subsection 2 of the Copyright Act – Use of works in connection with the media’s reporting of a current event – and, also taking into account freedom of expression, it was entitled to reproduce them without permission but must, however, pay remuneration for the use.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 54(2)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01295-x Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000 ab a ar
*00118099
*008 s2023||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a“Verdens Gang” :$bDecision of the Supreme Court of Norway 2 June 2022 – Case No. HR-2022-1113-A /$cAdvokatfirmaet Rogstad AS v. Verdens Gang AS Copyright Act, Secs. 29 and 36(2); European Convnetion on Human Rights, Art. 10.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2023.
*300 $as. 308
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(2)
*520 $a1. The use by a newspaper of photographs taken from a law firm's website and from an open Facebook profile without consent and without paying a remuneration is to be assessed under the current event rule in Sec. 36 subsection 2 of the Copyright Act and not under the rule on the right of quotation in Sec. 29. 2. Here it was found that: The newspaper’s use of the photographs has a legal basis in Sec. 36 subsection 2 of the Copyright Act – Use of works in connection with the media’s reporting of a current event – and, also taking into account freedom of expression, it was entitled to reproduce them without permission but must, however, pay remuneration for the use.
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$avalokuvat$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2699$2yso/fin
*650 7$asosiaalinen media$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20774$2yso/fin
*650 7$asanomalehdet $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2421$2yso/fin
*650 7$amedia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2445
*650 7$asananvapaus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7003$2yso/fin
*650 7$auutisointi$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21431$2yso/fin
*650 7$akorvaukset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4223$2yso/fin
*650 7$alehdistö$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2422$2yso/fin
*651 7$aNorja$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94309$2yso/fin
*653 $apäiväntapahtuma
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(2)
*852 $hSA-IIC
*85641$uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01295-x$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.