Hylly
Henkilönnimi Harpur, Paul, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö South African Constitutional Court Prioritises Constitutional Right to Access Information by Print Disabled over Protected Copyright Interests.
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 45(5)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. This case comment analyses the Constitutional Court of South Africa's judgment in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (Blind SA). The court declared the country's Copyright Act 1978 (CA) to be unconstitutional to the extent it prevents the print disabled from equally accessing information. By holding that protected copyright interests could not limit enjoyment of these constitutional rights, the court enabled print disabled South Africans to consume materials otherwise protected by copyright. Blind SA's prioritising human rights mandates over intellectual property regimes could precipitate recognition of these rights for the print disabled beyond South Africa, as well as provide judicial precedent for assertions of other human rights - such as the right to health - being elevated over other intellectual property protections.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi Stein, Michael Ashley, kirjoittaja. Ncube, Caroline B., kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 45(5)
*000 ab a ar
*00118833
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aHarpur, Paul,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aSouth African Constitutional Court Prioritises Constitutional Right to Access Information by Print Disabled over Protected Copyright Interests. /$cPaul Harpur, Michael Ashley Stein, Caroline B. Ncube.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300 $as. 299-305
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(5)
*520 $aThis case comment analyses the Constitutional Court of South Africa's judgment in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (Blind SA). The court declared the country's Copyright Act 1978 (CA) to be unconstitutional to the extent it prevents the print disabled from equally accessing information. By holding that protected copyright interests could not limit enjoyment of these constitutional rights, the court enabled print disabled South Africans to consume materials otherwise protected by copyright. Blind SA's prioritising human rights mandates over intellectual property regimes could precipitate recognition of these rights for the print disabled beyond South Africa, as well as provide judicial precedent for assertions of other human rights - such as the right to health - being elevated over other intellectual property protections.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$aihmisoikeudet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2402
*650 7$aperustuslait$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1594
*650 7$anäkövammaiset $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p78
*650 7$aperusoikeudet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p231
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*651 7$aEtelä-Afrikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105098
*653 $atekijänoikeuden rajoitukset ja poikkeukset
*7001 $aStein, Michael Ashley,$ekirjoittaja.
*7001 $aNcube, Caroline B.,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(5)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.