Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

*000      ab a        ar
*00119048
*008      s2023||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a"uploaded II" :$bDecision of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 June 2022 – Case No. I ZR 53/17; ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:020622UIZR53.17.0 /$cDirective 2001/29/EC, Art. 3(1); Copyright Act, Secs. 19a, 97.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2023.
*300  $as. 778-786
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(5)
*520  $aThe operator of a share hosting platform, who has or should have general knowledge of the availability of infringing content uploaded by users, makes a communication to the public itself of such content within the meaning of Sec. 15(2) first sentence and second sentence No. 2, Sec. 19a Copyright Act in conjunction with Art. 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC if it knowingly promotes such conduct on the part of users by adopting a business model that encourages users of the platform to make protected content available illegally to the public via its platform (following decision of the CJEU, 22 June 2021 – C-682/18 and C-683/18, GRUR 2021, 1054 [juris para. 84] = WRP 2021, 1019 – YouTube and Cyando [IIC 52:940–941 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01094-2].
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$apäätökset$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2868$2yso/fin
*650 7$averkkopalvelut$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6624$2yso/fin
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*651 7$aSaksa$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105087$2yso/fin
*653  $ayleisölle välittäminen
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(5)
*852  $hSA-IIC
^