Hylly SA-Intellectual Property Quarterly
Henkilönnimi Ncube, Caroline B., kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö When Human Rights Based Litigation Meets Copyright Reform : Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Intellectual Property Quarterly, ISSN 1364-906X ; 2/2023
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. South Africa's first constitutional court decision on copyright has profound implication for ongoing copyright reform and the development of norms at the intersection of human rights, disability and intellectual property rights. This commentary sets out the international framework, South African law and policy on disability rights, and the ongoing copyright reform process as background to the case. It then explains the basis on which the applicant secured a declaration of constitutional invalidity of sections of the Copyright Act due to the statute's failure to provide exceptions to enable access to literary works, inclusive of artistic works contained in them, for persons with visual and print disabilities, with a focus on the human rights arguments and findings. It concludes with a consideration of the practical effect of the outcome on the ongoing copyright reform process.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke Intellectual Property Quarterly, 1364-906X ; 2/2023.
*000 ab a ar
*00119174
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aNcube, Caroline B.,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aWhen Human Rights Based Litigation Meets Copyright Reform :$bBlind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition /$cCaroline B. Ncube.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300 $as. 86-100
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIntellectual Property Quarterly,$x1364-906X ;$v2/2023
*520 $aSouth Africa's first constitutional court decision on copyright has profound implication for ongoing copyright reform and the development of norms at the intersection of human rights, disability and intellectual property rights. This commentary sets out the international framework, South African law and policy on disability rights, and the ongoing copyright reform process as background to the case. It then explains the basis on which the applicant secured a declaration of constitutional invalidity of sections of the Copyright Act due to the statute's failure to provide exceptions to enable access to literary works, inclusive of artistic works contained in them, for persons with visual and print disabilities, with a focus on the human rights arguments and findings. It concludes with a consideration of the practical effect of the outcome on the ongoing copyright reform process.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$aperustuslait$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1594
*650 7$aihmisoikeudet$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2402
*650 7$anäkövammaiset $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p78
*650 7$asaavutettavuus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p858$2yso/fin
*651 7$aEtelä-Afrikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105098
*653 $atekijänoikeuden rajoitukset ja poikkeukset
*830 0$aIntellectual Property Quarterly,$x1364-906X ;$v2/2023.
*852 $hSA-Intellectual Property Quarterly
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.