Hylly
Henkilönnimi Colangelo, Giuseppe, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Antitrust Unchained : The EU’s Case Against Self-Preferencing
Julkaistu Verlag C.H. Beck, München : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa GRUR International, ISSN 2632-8623 ; 72(6)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Self-preferencing is the symbol of the competition policy Zeitgeist in digital markets. Large online platforms acting as gatekeepers to their ecosystems and engaging in a dual mode intermediation are accused of taking advantage of their hybrid business model by granting preferential treatment to their own products and services. Alongside the recent legislative initiatives undertaken around the world to impose a neutrality regime over digital gatekeepers by targeting different forms of self-preferencing, this practice is also emerging in Europe as a new antitrust theory of harm advanced by courts and competition authorities. In the aftermath of the General Court’s decision in Google Shopping and against the risk that the new label may merely provide antitrust enforcers with the opportunity to skip the legal standards and evidentiary burdens required to prove traditional anticompetitive behavior, this paper investigates whether and to what extent self-preferencing could be considered a new standalone offence in EU competition law.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke GRUR International, 2632-8623 ; 72(6)
*000 ab a ar
*00121574
*008 s2023||||gw |||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aColangelo, Giuseppe,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aAntitrust Unchained :$bThe EU’s Case Against Self-Preferencing /$cGiuseppe Colangelo.
*264 1$aMünchen :$bVerlag C.H. Beck,$c2023.
*300 $as. 538–556
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v72(6)
*520 $aSelf-preferencing is the symbol of the competition policy Zeitgeist in digital markets. Large online platforms acting as gatekeepers to their ecosystems and engaging in a dual mode intermediation are accused of taking advantage of their hybrid business model by granting preferential treatment to their own products and services. Alongside the recent legislative initiatives undertaken around the world to impose a neutrality regime over digital gatekeepers by targeting different forms of self-preferencing, this practice is also emerging in Europe as a new antitrust theory of harm advanced by courts and competition authorities. In the aftermath of the General Court’s decision in Google Shopping and against the risk that the new label may merely provide antitrust enforcers with the opportunity to skip the legal standards and evidentiary burdens required to prove traditional anticompetitive behavior, this paper investigates whether and to what extent self-preferencing could be considered a new standalone offence in EU competition law.
*61024$aEuroopan unioni$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000035482
*650 7$aInternet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20405$2yso/fin
*650 7$averkkopalvelut$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6624$2yso/fin
*650 7$akilpailuoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19178
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aGoogle$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p22952$2yso/fin
*650 7$averkkokauppa$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9457$2yso/fin
*650 $asisämarkkinat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2824
*653 $adigitaaliset sisämarkkinat
*653 $averkkoalustat
*830 0$aGRUR International,$x2632-8623 ;$v72(6)
*852 $hSA-GRUR International
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.