Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

A Chance at the Arts : Assessment of NYC Department of Education’s ArtsCount as a Violation of Title VI Implementing Regulation
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Henkilönnimi
  • Stanislaus, Siena, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • A Chance at the Arts : Assessment of NYC Department of Education’s ArtsCount as a Violation of Title VI Implementing Regulation
Julkaistu
  • 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • 1 verkkoaineisto (25 sivua)
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, ISSN 2161-9271 ; 46(4)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • The City of New York has historically struggled with equitable funding in its public education system. As a result, funding for arts education in New York City public schools has steadily declined. This trend further perpetuates a widespread cultural attitude that undervalues the academic benefits of arts education for students. This lack of support for the arts has particularly impacted schools located in low-income neighborhoods which suffer from low engagement with—and participation in—arts programs and arts instruction. Rocco Landesman, Former Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, wrote in his study on arts and achievement for at-risk youth that “the only outcomes we should need to measure for a music class is whether the child had the chance to create, enjoy, and understand music.” The New York City Department of Education has attempted to offer all students the chance to participate in arts education through various policy initiatives. In particular, New York City’s Blueprint for the Arts curriculum initiative and its supplemental accountability program, ArtsCount, were implemented to enhance students’ access to arts instruction. The decade following their implementation, however, revealed obvious shortcomings and failures. Moreover, the lack of reform of these initiatives perpetuates the culture of unequal access that is so commonly associated with arts education.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2161-9271 ; 46(4)
Elektronisen aineiston sijainti ja käyttö (URI)
  • https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v46i3.11240 Linkki verkkoaineistoon
*000      ab a        ar
*00121857
*008      s2023||||xxu|||||||||||||||||eng||            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aStanislaus, Siena,$ekirjoittaja.
*24512$aA Chance at the Arts :$bAssessment of NYC Department of Education’s ArtsCount as a Violation of Title VI Implementing Regulation /$cSiena Stanislaus.
*264 1$c2023.
*300  $a1 verkkoaineisto (25 sivua)
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $atietokonekäyttöinen$bc$2rdamedia
*338  $averkkoaineisto$bcr$2rdacarrier
*347  $atekstitiedosto$bPDF
*4901 $aThe Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,$x2161-9271 ;$v46(4)
*520  $aThe City of New York has historically struggled with equitable funding in its public education system. As a result, funding for arts education in New York City public schools has steadily declined. This trend further perpetuates a widespread cultural attitude that undervalues the academic benefits of arts education for students. This lack of support for the arts has particularly impacted schools located in low-income neighborhoods which suffer from low engagement with—and participation in—arts programs and arts instruction. Rocco Landesman, Former Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, wrote in his study on arts and achievement for at-risk youth that “the only outcomes we should need to measure for a music class is whether the child had the chance to create, enjoy, and understand music.” The New York City Department of Education has attempted to offer all students the chance to participate in arts education through various policy initiatives. In particular, New York City’s Blueprint for the Arts curriculum initiative and its supplemental accountability program, ArtsCount, were implemented to enhance students’ access to arts instruction. The decade following their implementation, however, revealed obvious shortcomings and failures. Moreover, the lack of reform of these initiatives perpetuates the culture of unequal access that is so commonly associated with arts education.
*650 7$ataidekasvatus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5457
*650 7$akoulutus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p84$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoppilaitokset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1028
*650 7$ataiteen perusopetus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21985
*651 7$aYhdysvallat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105078
*651 7$aNew York (kaupunki)$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105663
*830 0$aThe Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,$x2161-9271 ;$v46(4)
*85640$uhttps://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v46i3.11240$yLinkki verkkoaineistoon
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä