Hylly
Henkilönnimi Smartt, Ursula, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Are Our Law Students 'Robot Proof'? AI Chatbots and the Future of Working with Computer Generated Copyrighted Works
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 45(10)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT are now being used by university law students to write their coursework essays and cheat in examinations. Whilst there is tremendous scope of large language models to revolutionise the legal workspace and reduce tedious fact-checking by law trainees and paralegals, we need to teach our future lawyers to fact check their AI-generated work for garbage, including sources which simply do not exist, such as President Biden's counter terrorism strategy when writing about Lord Hoffmann's dissenting judgment in the Belmarsh case (2004). Otherwise, a law essay will be worthless; and in the wider world of music publishing or photography the adoption of AI creations may well breach copyright of works which were used to feed chatbots. The opinion expressed here includes a couple of examples from the author's own law teaching practices. Given the acceptance and acknowledgement that our law students will use large language model chatbots to deceive their tutors and examiners, we need to learn how to disrupt this practice and to ultimately engender a way to create a world which is robot-proof, where human potential includes reflection of reality and fact, whilst at the same time preparing legal trainees for the future legal workspace.
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 45(10)
*000 ab a ar
*00122041
*008 s2023||||xxk|||||||||||||||||eng||
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aSmartt, Ursula,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aAre Our Law Students 'Robot Proof'? AI Chatbots and the Future of Working with Computer Generated Copyrighted Works /$cUrsula Smartt.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2023.
*300 $as. 562-564
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(10)
*520 $aArtificial Intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT are now being used by university law students to write their coursework essays and cheat in examinations. Whilst there is tremendous scope of large language models to revolutionise the legal workspace and reduce tedious fact-checking by law trainees and paralegals, we need to teach our future lawyers to fact check their AI-generated work for garbage, including sources which simply do not exist, such as President Biden's counter terrorism strategy when writing about Lord Hoffmann's dissenting judgment in the Belmarsh case (2004). Otherwise, a law essay will be worthless; and in the wider world of music publishing or photography the adoption of AI creations may well breach copyright of works which were used to feed chatbots. The opinion expressed here includes a couple of examples from the author's own law teaching practices. Given the acceptance and acknowledgement that our law students will use large language model chatbots to deceive their tutors and examiners, we need to learn how to disrupt this practice and to ultimately engender a way to create a world which is robot-proof, where human potential includes reflection of reality and fact, whilst at the same time preparing legal trainees for the future legal workspace.
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$achattibotit$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p39028$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekoäly$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
*650 7$aopiskelijat$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16486
*650 7$aopetus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2630
*650 7$aoikeustiede$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3582
*650 7$avilppi $2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p169
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v45(10)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.