Hylly
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö “Castorama Polska and Knor” : Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) 27 April 2023 – Case No. C-628/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:342
Julkaistu Springer, Heidelberg : 2023.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 54(9)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. Article 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as meaning that, in proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right under that provision, the applicant must, for the purpose of a request for information under Article 8, provide any reasonably available evidence enabling the court seised of that request to satisfy itself with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant is the rightholder, by submitting evidence appropriate to the nature of that right and any special applicable formalities.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 54(9)
*000 ab a ar
*00122771
*008 s2023 gw e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*24500$a“Castorama Polska and Knor” :$bDecision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) 27 April 2023 – Case No. C-628/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:342 /$cTB, Castorama Polska sp. z o.o. and ‘Knor’ sp. z o.o. Directive 2004/48/EC.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2023.
*300 $as. 1422
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(9)
*520 $aArticle 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as meaning that, in proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right under that provision, the applicant must, for the purpose of a request for information under Article 8, provide any reasonably available evidence enabling the court seised of that request to satisfy itself with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant is the rightholder, by submitting evidence appropriate to the nature of that right and any special applicable formalities.
*61024$aEuroopan unioni$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000035482
*61024$aEuroopan unionin tuomioistuin$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000031936
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aoikeustapaukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7219
*650 7$atäytäntöönpano$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4246
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v54(9)
*852 $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.