Hylly
Henkilönnimi Ruijsenaars, Heijo, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö A WIPO Broadcasters' Treaty : The Final Decision is Long Overdue
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 46(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. For many years now, broadcasters are being impelled by modern-day audio and video consumption behaviour to provide convenient, portable and cross-border access to their signals, through online platforms, IP-TV and OTT ("over-the-top") services. It goes without saying that broadcasters wish to offer their audiences such access to their programmes by any means. However, they cannot be expected to invest in such access if appropriate protection of their signals is not guaranteed. At the international level, the legal protection under the 1961 Rome Convention is clearly outdated. With the increasing on-demand consumption of broadcasters' programming, the gaps are growing rapidly. By representing the most robust safeguard for cultural diversity and media pluralism, broadcasters provide more benefits to society than anyone else in the copyright sector. They are key in ensuring fundamental democratic values, such as freedom of expression, but are also vitally important in introducing local creative talent to the general public. Moreover, everyone loses out from broadcast piracy: creators, performers, sport rightholders - and citizens too. In light of the above, there is an undeniable oversight that none of the current international rules on the protection of broadcasters take due account of the new platforms for signal distribution which include not only cable and satellite services, but also digital and online services, broadband networks, connected-TVs, USB sticks, smart phones and tablets. Pirated programmes are also used to drive equipment sales such as set-up boxes with in-built players and add-ons providing deep links to pirate's websites. All these forms of signal piracy should be properly addressed; the urgency for multinational legislative measures has never been greater before. Hence, the ongoing World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) debate for the update of the broadcasters' neighbouring right must now move to its decisive, final stage.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 46(2)
*000 ab a ar
*00123704
*008 s2024 xxk e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aRuijsenaars, Heijo,$ekirjoittaja.
*24512$aA WIPO Broadcasters' Treaty :$bThe Final Decision is Long Overdue /$cDr Heijo Ruijsenaars.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2024.
*300 $as. 89-101
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v46(2)
*520 $aFor many years now, broadcasters are being impelled by modern-day audio and video consumption behaviour to provide convenient, portable and cross-border access to their signals, through online platforms, IP-TV and OTT ("over-the-top") services. It goes without saying that broadcasters wish to offer their audiences such access to their programmes by any means. However, they cannot be expected to invest in such access if appropriate protection of their signals is not guaranteed. At the international level, the legal protection under the 1961 Rome Convention is clearly outdated. With the increasing on-demand consumption of broadcasters' programming, the gaps are growing rapidly. By representing the most robust safeguard for cultural diversity and media pluralism, broadcasters provide more benefits to society than anyone else in the copyright sector. They are key in ensuring fundamental democratic values, such as freedom of expression, but are also vitally important in introducing local creative talent to the general public. Moreover, everyone loses out from broadcast piracy: creators, performers, sport rightholders - and citizens too. In light of the above, there is an undeniable oversight that none of the current international rules on the protection of broadcasters take due account of the new platforms for signal distribution which include not only cable and satellite services, but also digital and online services, broadband networks, connected-TVs, USB sticks, smart phones and tablets. Pirated programmes are also used to drive equipment sales such as set-up boxes with in-built players and add-ons providing deep links to pirate's websites. All these forms of signal piracy should be properly addressed; the urgency for multinational legislative measures has never been greater before. Hence, the ongoing World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) debate for the update of the broadcasters' neighbouring right must now move to its decisive, final stage.
*61024$aMaailman henkisen omaisuuden järjestö.$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000014370
*650 7$atelevisio (joukkoviestimet)$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5759
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$alähioikeudet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11910$2yso/fin
*650 7$alähetystekniikka$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p28005$2yso/fin
*650 7$adigitaalitekniikka $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8567$2yso/fin
*650 7$apiratismi$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11912$2yso/fin
*650 7$akansainvälinen tekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11933$2yso/fin
*650 7$akansainväliset sopimukset$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p322
*653 $aIPTV
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v46(2)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.