Hylly
Henkilönnimi Perry, Thomas, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Advancing Technologies and Copyright : ECJ Considers New Complexities Relating to Reproduction, Private Copying, and Communication to the Public
Julkaistu Sweet & Maxwell, London : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa European Intellectual Property Review, ISSN 0142-0461 ; 46(1)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. In Ocilion, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled on two important aspects relating to Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright and related rights in the information society. Firstly, that the 'private copying' exception contained within art.5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 does not apply where copies made by the users of an IPTV service can be made available to an indeterminate number of people. Secondly, the court ruled that art.3(1) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as meaning that the provision of hardware, software and technical assistance, which enable customers to replay online television broadcast content does not constitute a communication to the public, even where there is knowledge that services may be used to access protected content without the consent of the author. This article assesses the reasons for the decision and the likely implications.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi Hyland, Mark, kirjoittaja.
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke European Intellectual Property Review, 0142-0461 ; 46(1)
*000 ab a ar
*00124019
*008 s2024 xxk e |||| 0|eng |
*040 $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aPerry, Thomas,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aAdvancing Technologies and Copyright :$bECJ Considers New Complexities Relating to Reproduction, Private Copying, and Communication to the Public /$cThomas Perry, Dr Mark Hyland.
*264 1$aLondon :$bSweet & Maxwell,$c2024.
*300 $as. 45-49
*336 $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v46(1)
*520 $aIn Ocilion, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled on two important aspects relating to Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright and related rights in the information society. Firstly, that the 'private copying' exception contained within art.5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 does not apply where copies made by the users of an IPTV service can be made available to an indeterminate number of people. Secondly, the court ruled that art.3(1) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as meaning that the provision of hardware, software and technical assistance, which enable customers to replay online television broadcast content does not constitute a communication to the public, even where there is knowledge that services may be used to access protected content without the consent of the author. This article assesses the reasons for the decision and the likely implications.
*61024$aEuroopan unionin tuomioistuin$0(FI-ASTERI-N)000031936
*650 7$atekijänoikeuslaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9817
*650 7$akansainvälinen tekijänoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11933
*650 7$atekijänoikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2346$2yso/fin
*650 7$alähioikeudet$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11910$2yso/fin
*650 7$alainsäädäntö$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13854
*650 7$aEU-oikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20733$2yso/fin
*650 7$aEU-direktiivit $0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10768$2yso/fin
*650 7$akopiointi$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2175
*650 7$atelevisiotekniikka$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10538
*651 7$aItä-Timor$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p110281
*653 $ayleisölle välittäminen
*653 $ayksityinen kopiointi
*653 $aIPTV
*653 $aedelleen lähettäminen
*653 $akappaleen valmistaminen
*7001 $aHyland, Mark,$ekirjoittaja.
*830 0$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review,$x0142-0461 ;$v46(1)
*852 $hSA-EIPR
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.