Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Confusion, unfair competition and legal action in OAPI countries
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-JIPLP
Henkilönnimi
  • Lowe Gnintedem, Patrick Juvet, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Confusion, unfair competition and legal action in OAPI countries
Julkaistu
  • Oxford University Press, Oxford : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 170–176
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, ISSN 1747-1532 ; 19(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • This paper analyses the interpretation of confusion and the consequences it has on legal action, considering its compliance with the international framework and with regard to the case law of the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) Member States. It argues that provisions of the Bangui Agreement (2015), in particular Annex VIII on unfair competition, are in compliance with international agreements, and the substantial interpretation of confusion made by the case law of the OAPI countries is appropriate. Although OAPI statutory bodies have the possibility to appreciate likelihood of confusion, only the judicial judges have the ultimate authority to give a binding interpretation. When confusion concerns a registered intellectual property right (IPR), a plaintiff can introduce both an action for infringement and an action for unfair competition, or only one of these actions. However, the action for unfair competition has a larger spectrum; it can be introduced even when there is no registered IPR, provided that a separate fault is demonstrated, in combination with the other constitutive elements of unfair competition. Reference made by judges either to national civil liability provisions, to Annex VIII, or to both provisions, as the legal basis of the action for unfair competition, should be harmonized in favour of Annex VIII, even if, in practice, it has not proved to be damaging for any litigant.
Yhteisönnimi
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1747-1532 ; 19(2)
*000      ab a        ar
*00124510
*008      s2024    xxk    e     |||| 0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aLowe Gnintedem, Patrick Juvet,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aConfusion, unfair competition and legal action in OAPI countries /$cPatrick Juvet Lowe Gnintedem.
*264 1$aOxford :$bOxford University Press,$c2024.
*300  $as. 170–176
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v19(2)
*520  $aThis paper analyses the interpretation of confusion and the consequences it has on legal action, considering its compliance with the international framework and with regard to the case law of the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) Member States. It argues that provisions of the Bangui Agreement (2015), in particular Annex VIII on unfair competition, are in compliance with international agreements, and the substantial interpretation of confusion made by the case law of the OAPI countries is appropriate. Although OAPI statutory bodies have the possibility to appreciate likelihood of confusion, only the judicial judges have the ultimate authority to give a binding interpretation. When confusion concerns a registered intellectual property right (IPR), a plaintiff can introduce both an action for infringement and an action for unfair competition, or only one of these actions. However, the action for unfair competition has a larger spectrum; it can be introduced even when there is no registered IPR, provided that a separate fault is demonstrated, in combination with the other constitutive elements of unfair competition. Reference made by judges either to national civil liability provisions, to Annex VIII, or to both provisions, as the legal basis of the action for unfair competition, should be harmonized in favour of Annex VIII, even if, in practice, it has not proved to be damaging for any litigant.
*61024$aOrganisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OAPI)
*650 7$akilpailuoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19178
*650 7$aimmateriaalioikeus$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3068$2yso/fin
*650 7$atavaramerkit$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1488
*650 7$atavaramerkkilaki$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21904
*651 7$aAfrikka$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p94080$2yso/fin
*653  $avilpillinen kilpailu
*653  $aOAPI
*830 0$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$x1747-1532 ;$v19(2)
*852  $hSA-JIPLP
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-JIPLP