Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto

Developments in the Extraterritorial Application of Vietnamese Competition Law – Grab’s Acquisition of Uber’s Southeast Asia Operation
Muistilista on tyhjä
Vis
Hylly
  • SA-IIC
Henkilönnimi
  • Thi Thanh Ha, Binh, kirjoittaja.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö
  • Developments in the Extraterritorial Application of Vietnamese Competition Law – Grab’s Acquisition of Uber’s Southeast Asia Operation
Julkaistu
  • Springer, Heidelberg : 2024.
Ulkoasutiedot
  • s. 213–236
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, ISSN 0018-9855 ; 55(2)
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.
  • Vietnam’s first regulation on merger control was its 2004 Competition Law. A little over a decade after the merger review regime had been established, a number of obstacles and inadequacies were detected. Critics noted that the Law provided ineffective control over economic concentration practices. This was especially true for transactions that, although overseas, nevertheless had adverse effects on competition in Vietnam. The Vietnam Competition Council’s decision regarding Grab’s acquisition of Uber’s business in Southeast Asia (including Vietnam) is one example of how the 2004 Competition Law struggled with the complexity of transnational and foreign-based transactions. Using Grab’s acquisition of Uber’s business as a case study, this paper analyzes how Vietnamese law on controlling economic concentration practices has developed. It is argued that, although the merger control regime in Vietnam has undergone considerable development, with the 2018 Competition Law replacing the 2004 Competition Law, some issues still need to be addressed in order to achieve better alignment with market practices. At the same time, the law needs to evolve in order to make the enforcement of Vietnam’s regulations on merger control more effective, especially with regard to foreign-to-foreign transactions.
Asiasana
Maantieteellinen nimi asiasanana
Sarjalisäkirjaus - yhtenäistetty nimeke
  • IIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 0018-9855 ; 55(2).
*000      ab a        ar
*00124711
*008      s2024    gw     e     |||| 0|eng |            
*040  $aFI-CUTE$bfin$erda
*0410 $aeng
*1001 $aThi Thanh Ha, Binh,$ekirjoittaja.
*24510$aDevelopments in the Extraterritorial Application of Vietnamese Competition Law – Grab’s Acquisition of Uber’s Southeast Asia Operation /$cBinh Thi Thanh Ha.
*264 1$aHeidelberg :$bSpringer,$c2024.
*300  $as. 213–236
*336  $ateksti$btxt$2rdacontent
*337  $akäytettävissä ilman laitetta$bn$2rdamedia
*338  $anide$bnc$2rdacarrier
*4901 $aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(2)
*520  $aVietnam’s first regulation on merger control was its 2004 Competition Law. A little over a decade after the merger review regime had been established, a number of obstacles and inadequacies were detected. Critics noted that the Law provided ineffective control over economic concentration practices. This was especially true for transactions that, although overseas, nevertheless had adverse effects on competition in Vietnam. The Vietnam Competition Council’s decision regarding Grab’s acquisition of Uber’s business in Southeast Asia (including Vietnam) is one example of how the 2004 Competition Law struggled with the complexity of transnational and foreign-based transactions. Using Grab’s acquisition of Uber’s business as a case study, this paper analyzes how Vietnamese law on controlling economic concentration practices has developed. It is argued that, although the merger control regime in Vietnam has undergone considerable development, with the 2018 Competition Law replacing the 2004 Competition Law, some issues still need to be addressed in order to achieve better alignment with market practices. At the same time, the law needs to evolve in order to make the enforcement of Vietnam’s regulations on merger control more effective, especially with regard to foreign-to-foreign transactions.
*650 7$akilpailuoikeus$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19178
*651 7$aVietnam$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p104988
*651 7$aKaakkois-Aasia$2yso/fin$0http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p105337
*830 0$aIIC : International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,$x0018-9855 ;$v55(2).
*852  $hSA-IIC
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.
Vis
Lähetä
Niteen tunnusTilaEräpäiväKuuluuSijaintiHylly
Ex1Saatavana (ei lainattavissa) KirjastoKirjasto SA-IIC