Hylly
Henkilönnimi
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö Google jumps to implement right to be forgotten
Julkaistu
Ulkoasutiedot
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa Intellectual Property Magazine, ISSN 2044-7175 ; July/August
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms. The Court of Justice of the European Unions (CJEU) recent ruling allowing individuals the right to request the removal of search result links presents a setback for Google and other internet search engines.1 The case concerns a clash between fundamental rights contained in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: the right to respect for private life and protection of personal data,2 and the right to freedom of expression and access to information.3 The CJEU has now ruled firmly in favour of the right to privacy and empowering vulnerable, individual consumers to safeguard their online profiles. Although this ruling is made under current law, it anticipates the right to be forgotten and to erasure included in the modernisation of the EUs data protection rules under discussion at EU level.4 While the decision has been welcomed by some as a victory for privacy, others have condemned it as undermining the internet as an information resource and introducing a form of online censorship. Attention has focused on the right to be forgotten, (a catchy but inaccurate label) established in this case. However, the judgment is also important for extending the jurisdictional reach of European data privacy laws to US entities. Significantly, the CJEU has held that internet search engines are data controllers, with responsibility for compliance with data protection rules.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton
Henkilönnimi
*00002346nab a22003374a 4500
*0019279
*00520201106111818.0
*007tu
*008150121s2014\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035 $a21842
*035 $a(PLib-conv)0000021842
*0410 $aeng
*090 $aOMA:SA-IN45
*1001 $aArmitage, Emma.
*24510$aGoogle jumps to implement right to be forgotten /$cEmma Armitage, Rachel Tregear.
*260 $c2014.
*300 $a44-46.
*4901 $aIntellectual Property Magazine,$x2044-7175 ;$vJuly/August
*520 $aThe Court of Justice of the European Unions (CJEU) recent ruling allowing individuals the right to request the removal of search result links presents a setback for Google and other internet search engines.1 The case concerns a clash between fundamental rights contained in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: the right to respect for private life and protection of personal data,2 and the right to freedom of expression and access to information.3 The CJEU has now ruled firmly in favour of the right to privacy and empowering vulnerable, individual consumers to safeguard their online profiles. Although this ruling is made under current law, it anticipates the right to be forgotten and to erasure included in the modernisation of the EUs data protection rules under discussion at EU level.4 While the decision has been welcomed by some as a victory for privacy, others have condemned it as undermining the internet as an information resource and introducing a form of online censorship. Attention has focused on the right to be forgotten, (a catchy but inaccurate label) established in this case. However, the judgment is also important for extending the jurisdictional reach of European data privacy laws to US entities. Significantly, the CJEU has held that internet search engines are data controllers, with responsibility for compliance with data protection rules.
*653 $aGOOGLE
*653 $aKRIITTISYYS
*653 $aKUNNIANLOUKKAUS
*653 $aEU
*653 $aYKSILÖNSUOJA
*653 $aOIKEUS TULLA UNOHDETUKSI
*653 $aright to be forgotten
*653 $aCJEU
*7001 $aTregear, Rachel.
*8102 $aIntellectual Property Magazine,$x2044-7175 ;$vJuly/August
*852 $hSA-IN45$cARMITAGE
*979 $a0000021842
*999 $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^
Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä
kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.