Tekijänoikeuden erikoiskirjasto : 3D printing away from control

Hylly	HORNICK SA-IN45
Henkilönnimi	Hornick, John.
Nimeke- ja vastuullisuusmerkintö	3D printing away from control
Julkaistu	2014.
Ulkoasutiedot	26-28.
Sarjamerkintö ei-lisäkirjausmuodossa	Intellectual Property Magazine, ISSN 2044-7175 ; November
Huomautus sisällöstä, tiivistelmä tms.	P lawyers think of intellectual property as a collection of rights, but non-lawyers tend to think of IP as the fruit of human creativity. This is an important distinction for understanding IP in the context of 3D printing. It is also important to recognise, as Michael Weinberg of Public Knowledge has correctly observed, that most of the physical world is not protected by any type of intellectual property rights.1 IP principles apply to 3D printing just as they apply to any other type of technology. However, it is the scale of 3D printing that may have profound effects on IP. 3D printing cuts across all types of IP, all types of technology, and almost all types of products. Eventually, anyone will be able to recreate almost any existing product design and manufacture and distribute it, or simply make and use it. No one will know they did it and no one will be able to control it, which I call 3D printing away from control. As industrial and personal 3D printers become capable of making more and more things, away from control infringement will proliferate and IP rights will become increasingly irrelevant. Impotent may be a better word. The Gartner group predicts that, by 2018, 3D printing will result in the loss of at least ¤100bn per year in intellectual property globally.2 Similar predictions, which turned out to be accurate, were made about the music industry in the mid-to-late 1990s. Gartners prediction seems to be based not only on IP infringement, but also on IP that will never be bought. 3D printing may result in widespread copying, especially of consumer products, but perhaps more importantly, companies that formerly bought replacement parts will start making the parts themselves, or repairing them.
Asiasana - Kontrolloimaton	3D-TULOSTUS TULOSTUS

*00002464nab a22002534a 4500
*0019291
*00520201106111818.0
*007tu
*008150128s2014\\\\xx\|||||\||||\|||||0eng|c
*035  $a21854
*035  $a(PLib-conv)0000021854
*0410 $aeng
*090  $aOMA:SA-IN45
*1001 $aHornick, John.
*24510$a3D printing away from control /$cJohn Hornick.
*260  $c2014.
*300  $a26-28.
*4901 $aIntellectual Property Magazine,$x2044-7175 ;$vNovember
*520  $aP lawyers think of intellectual property as a collection of rights, but non-lawyers tend to think of IP as the fruit of human creativity. This is an important distinction for understanding IP in the context of 3D printing. It is also important to recognise, as Michael Weinberg of Public Knowledge has correctly observed, that most of the physical world is not protected by any type of intellectual property rights.1  IP principles apply to 3D printing just as they apply to any other type of technology. However, it is the scale of 3D printing that may have profound effects on IP. 3D printing cuts across all types of IP, all types of technology, and almost all types of products.  Eventually, anyone will be able to recreate almost any existing product design and manufacture and distribute it, or simply make and use it. No one will know they did it and no one will be able to control it, which I call 3D printing away from control.  As industrial and personal 3D printers become capable of making more and more things, away from control infringement will proliferate and IP rights will become increasingly irrelevant. Impotent may be a better word.  The Gartner group predicts that, by 2018, 3D printing will result in the loss of at least ¤100bn per year in intellectual property globally.2 Similar predictions, which turned out to be accurate, were made about the music industry in the mid-to-late 1990s. Gartners prediction seems to be based not only on IP infringement, but also on IP that will never be bought. 3D printing may result in widespread copying, especially of consumer products, but perhaps more importantly, companies that formerly bought replacement parts will start making the parts themselves, or repairing them.
*653  $a3D-TULOSTUS
*653  $aTULOSTUS
*8102 $aIntellectual Property Magazine,$x2044-7175 ;$vNovember
*852  $hSA-IN45$cHORNICK
*979  $a0000021854
*999  $aMikroMarc$b[Article]$x7
^

Tästä teoksesta ei ole arvioita.
Näpäytä kun haluat kirjoittaa ensimmäisen arvion.